Talk:Prison consultant

Blanking out of entire section

This article was brought to my attention through a vandalism tool because of its drastic removal of an entire section. I appreciate the comments of the IP user that made the changes, but a switch like this cannot be done without prior conversations in this same Talk Page. If this section serves as a promotional platform (which it also appears to me), please, do not just erase it. Actions like this will just provoke reactions in the opposite direction. Bring the topic here, propose the changes, and follow through. If, for any chance, editors here were not helpful, you always can request experienced editors to help in arbitration or just bring your case to the arbitration committee.

I'm much more concerned that any section like this will contain BLP violations, than I am about promotional content, though both were present and both are a reason to nuke the section. Please note that you restored content claiming that several people were former federal prisoners, without any source to support the claim that these men had been in prison. As such, I will be removing the section again. However, even if the material is sourced, I believe it should be removed as promotional content without any encyclopedic value. Please don't restore it wothout a good reason; the onus is on the person adding the content to justify it. 209.211.131.181 (talk) 07:22, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Given the evidence of undisclosed paid editing in the article history and the talk page section below, I now believe the article should be deleted entirely. 209.211.131.181 (talk) 22:30, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Richard gall

please stop removing Richard gall. Brainstorm Prison Consultants of Gallservices is his company his is one of the few who have actual proof they where in prison on this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Btchpissed (talk • contribs) 21:08, 2 December 2015 (UTC)