Talk:Ritual (electronic band)

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Electronic music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 9 November 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved with genre disambiguator (closed by non-admin page mover) SITH (talk) 12:33, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ritual (UK band) → Ritual (2010s band)
Ritual (band) → Ritual (1980s band)

– Disambiguation needed as they're both UK bands and I don't see a primary topic. Flooded with them hundreds 06:21, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support Per WP:PRECISE and WP:PDAB. Crouch, Swale (talk) 10:03, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Is the decade dismabig the standard, or is the genre of the band used? Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 13:07, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support moving, but Lugnuts is correct that their different musical genres should be preferenced over their years of activity — so the disambiguators should be more like "post-punk band" and "electronic band", or something along those lines. Bearcat (talk) 19:48, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
People are likely to look for a band using the "old band/new band" thinking so the decades disambiguator may be more helpful than the genres because they are inconsistent as bands and musicians nowadays fuse multiple genres. Flooded with them hundreds 08:23, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Except that people may not necessarily know whether the band they're looking for is the "old band" or the "new band". Given that these days the "discovery" of a band the reader didn't already know about is likely to come from hearing them on YouTube or Spotify or Pandora or Slacker, people who weren't already familiar with the band, and are looking for a Wikipedia article to learn more about this "new to them" band they just discovered on a streaming platform, are much likelier to know what style of music they just heard than they are when the music was made. Bearcat (talk) 20:38, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support moving but oppose decade disambiguation per Bearcat and Lugnuts. The three musical artists I discovered most recently were active in the 1980s (Martika), the 2010s (The Dead South) and the 1960s-1980s (Jeanette (singer)). Until I looked them up on Wikipedia I didn't know this. Thryduulf (talk) 17:52, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support moving but oppose decade disambiguation I find that it is clearer if the band is identified by genre since it looks like they only existed in the 2010s with that identifier. EllenZoe (talk) 15:49, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.