Jump to content

Talk:Safoora Zargar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:03, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TheChunky: If you want the file preserved, you need to take action on Commons.-- Toddy1 (talk) 18:56, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for informing me. I have provided "permission" proof many times in the commons, but I don't understand why the admins there don't understand that. They keep asking more and more. Last time, they asked me for permission of Masrat Zahra and Sagrika Kissu for using their pics. Both of them had uploaded the pic in public domain and they left those pics for 'free to use'. But I was still asked for permission and I contact them and motivated both of them to email that permission format, then later commons admin replied with another form and made it hard for getting permission after having permission from real owner.
In short, the above pic of Safoora Zargar is also uploaded with permission and I have added the link there too. But still they asked for permission. So I think instead of having the headache, I prefer they should delete it. That is better option for me. Thank You ❤️. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri (Speak🗣️ or Write✍️) — Preceding undated comment added 10:54, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gulfisha Fatima

@Aafi: Regarding this edit, the article entitled Gulfisha Fatima was deleted because it was a copyright violation. -- Toddy1 (talk) 19:14, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Toddy1: I did notice it. I removed it because nobody would be eventually seeing it. It could be mentioned elsewhere as a redlink in the body. But WP:SEEALSO doesn't permit it: "The "See also" section should not include red links." ─ Aafī (talk) 19:28, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]