Jump to content

Talk:Sanjukta Chakravorti

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Having reservation on moving this article to main namespace

Dear Robert McClenon, I consider you as a very seasoned reviewer but please do forgive me if I am crossing any line by questioning your judgement. This entity is yet not ready for a main article namespace move because as a scholar her h-index is very much low to qualify WP:ACADEMIC or WP:NPROF. She is a WP:TOOSOON case. I would humbly request if you could please reconsider your decision on this. However, if I am wrong in my assessment, then I would request you to help me with my understanding so that I can take right calls in future page assessments. Thank you. - Hatchens (talk) 03:00, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hatchens - I accepted the article based on a combination of two considerations. First, the criterion for accepting a draft is supposed to be that the article is thought to have at least a 50% likelihood of surviving an AFD. Most reviewers actually are much stricter, and I usually also am. Second, I made a judgment about systemic bias, that she represents multiple under-represented demographics as a female Asian scientist. So I decided to take a chance. That is why I accepted the article. I see that you might disagree. I do not plan to reconsider my acceptance, but I will not be annoyed if you nominate it for AFD. Is that sort of clear? Robert McClenon (talk) 04:41, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Robert McClenon for sharing the interpretation. This (interpretation) I will take as a part of my learning. And, I will not nominate it for WP:AFD because my primary intent is to learn, and since it's the case of "under-represented demographics" of a "female Asian scientist"... you've my undaunted support. - Hatchens (talk) 04:56, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Do not remove comments from talk pages. It is disruptive. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:41, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]