Talk:Selective reduction

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Selective reduction.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Medicine: Reproductive Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Reproductive medicine task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Women's Health High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Abortion Start‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Abortion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Abortion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AbortionWikipedia:WikiProject AbortionTemplate:WikiProject AbortionAbortion
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

"Eugenics"

Someone added an unsourced claim that selective reduction has been opposed (by whom? when? in what contexts?) as "a form of eugenics". This is a pretty specific claim (about an extremist position) and requires citation to reliable independent verifiable sources. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(^Õل^ō)ˀ Contribs. 06:39, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Selective termination and elective reduction

According to Yaron et al., "Selective termination is employed in multifetal pregnancies, in the presence of an abnormal fetus, in order to improve the prognosis of the normal fetuses. The term elective reduction is used to describe reduction in twin pregnancies for maternal medical conditions, psychological, or socio-economic reasons." Is this article confounding two different concepts? --PeeKoo (talk) 17:27, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the articles I read refer to "selective reduction" as being the aborting of some fetuses in a multiple pregnancy because multiple births are risky or because the mother or couple do not want a multiple pregnancy. Those articles have been in the press, not in the medical literature, and since this is an encyclopedia, not a medical textbook, using the common term is most appropriate.--Bruce Hall (talk) 00:19, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fetal deformaties a reason for "selective reduction"

None of the articles that I have read, all non-medical, have mentioned using selective reduction for fetal deformaties. The comment above makes me think that the reference to fetal deformaties does not belong in this article but in another article about another procedure or practice.--Bruce Hall (talk) 00:19, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]