Talk:Sex scandal

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Talk:Sex scandal/Archive 1

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 January 2019 and 15 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Brandynblakely, Rgira003, Chelsea.asare220, Tcervi, IsabellaForth, TylerCresser50, Ty Tedford. Peer reviewers: Mvanb003, Brandynblakely, Rgira003, TylerCresser50.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 09:03, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 September 2019 and 9 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): DiaEdie.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 09:03, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lord Lambton

Added him, having been reminded by his recent obituary. Are we ordering these things by date or alphabetically ? WMMartin 17:59, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chrono Order

Seems to make more sense to me. I moved some things, but someone moved them back. We need to talk. Paul, in Saudi 04:01, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removing list

I've removed a very poorly sourced list of sex scandals that violated WP:V and WP:BLP. Only a very small number of entries were sourced, and those sources were largely unreliable. Had I left a very small number of entries, that would have given undue attention to them, so I decided to remove the whole lot with this edit. (adding) Should anyone wish to resurrect the list, they can grab the entries from that diff and find references for a significant number of the entries. When adding to an article, the burden is on the one doing the addition to provide sources if the material is likely to be challenged. - Jehochman ^Talk 15:06, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article is being discussed at WP:BLPN. - Jehochman ^Talk 16:26, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gutted, stubbed, too much OR

I've emptied the article down to this version, from this previous state it was in. Too much original research. • Lawrence Cohen 16:37, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]