Talk:Shikkoku no Sharnoth: What a Beautiful Tomorrow

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Video games: Visual novels Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the visual novels task force.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Outfolded (3 participants)
NoFrag (1 participant)
VoxelStorm (0 participants)
GameRevolution (5 participants)
List of longest-running video game franchises (11 participants)
Atomas (1 participant)
PLAY: The Games Festival (3 participants)
FloodSim (3 participants)
Kunimitsu and Kunimitsu II (2 participants)
Blast Monkeys (2 participants)
Free Internet Chess Server (9 participants; relisted)
Gilman Louie (3 participants; relisted)
Yoshimitsu (5 participants; relisted)
Emote (3 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Donkey Kong (nom)

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

Sun Haven

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

why is there a page for this but not inganock? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.212.151.9 (talk) 21:23, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is what people make of it. If you would like an article about Inganock, I suggest you be bold, create an account, and create the article. --Remy Suen (talk) 22:22, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it looks like there was at some point an inganock article, but that it was removed (title in red), that doesn't make a lot of sense since this is an (indirect) sequel and inganock is at least as famous as this if not more. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.152.162.114 (talk) 16:33, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]