Talk:Sodium amide

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Chemicals: Core Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This is a core article in the WikiProject Chemicals worklist.

NaNH2 as a reagent

I made some changes that organic chemists may choose to revise further. NaNH2 has no odor, it's a salt after all. Its use in the lab has almost disappeared with the introduction of stronger, more soluble, or more easily handled bases. I am skeptical of the comment that O2 converts NaNH2 to nitrogen oxides.--Smokefoot 04:37, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Safety: Burns in air to form nitrogen?

You mean nitrogen dioxide, right? Scot.parker 19:27, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

pKb = 33?

I thought strong bases had low pKb's. Does 33 refer to pKa?

Agree something is odd here - either the value should be negative i.e. -33 (seems it has been changed from 33 to 38 at some point) or it is pKa value. At any rate it should have a reference -- Quantockgoblin (talk) 00:29, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From acid dissociation constant, $K_{b}={\frac {K_{w}}{K_{a}}}$ .

The pK_a of NH₃ is around 33, i.e. K_a ≈ 10⁻³³, so its pK_b should be approximately $-\log _{10}\left({\frac {10^{-14}}{10^{-33}}}\right)=-\log _{10}\left(10^{19}\right)=-19$ .

Acid dissociation constant#pKa of some common substances gives the pK_b of sodium amide as −19.

Ben (talk) 08:37, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Added reference to page as cited in the pKa table in Jerry March Advanced Organic Chemistry p 252, fourth ed. -- Quantockgoblin (talk) 11:31, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

name alternative

the ^-NR₂ ion is sometimes referred as "azanide". It also appears to be the most correct IUPAC name (since "amide" properly refers to the -CONR₂ group). Such page does not exist, maybe it can be created so that there is a specific page, instead of relying on disambiguations. I'd do it myself but I don't know how... 79.56.184.112 (talk) 10:51, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well in a long career as a chemist, I have never heard anyone use that term except one editor at Wikipedia. In fact its usage is a sure sign that the the user is not a practicing chemist! IUPAC's intentions are certainly good, but sometimes their nomenclature recommendations are so out of step with contemporary chemistry that they should be politely ignored. That seems to be the prevailing view around here. --Smokefoot (talk) 12:12, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed this user is still a student.. However, that was merely a suggestion. It might be outdate and unused as a term, but in case it's an official name, it could be included for the sake of knowledge, if not for practical use. I believe the prevaling view here is that wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a handbook. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.55.62.150 (talk) 11:01, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Amide (has two meanings)

Isnt amide used both for acid amides and the name of the conjugate base of ammonia? I am thinking of the newly added "Sodium amide, despite its name, is not technically an amide as it does not contain the carbonyl functional group." Christian75 (talk) 07:34, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Its an old problem in nomenclature. It also applies to lithium diisopropylamide, [[lithium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide],] potassium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide, and many related derivatives. My feeling had been that those looking at thee pretty specialized article are sophisticated and would find such an explanation to be distracting. Possibly the best place to do your explaining is in metal amides. --Smokefoot (talk) 14:26, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The use of the systematic name (sodium) azanide solves the problem of disambiguation.--109.166.206.2 (talk) 18:03, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kinetic data of direct synthesis

What kinetic data are avalaible to the direct synthesis of this compound from sodium and liquid ammonia (to be inserted in article)?--5.2.200.163 (talk) 16:11, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Sodium amide/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.^[?]
See if possible if there is a free use image that can go on the top right corner of this article.^[?]
Per Wikipedia:What is a featured article?, Images should have concise captions.^[?]
Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: behaviour (B) (American: behavior), ization (A) (British: isation), gray (A) (British: grey), grey (B) (American: gray).
~~You may wish to convert your form of references to the cite.php footnote system that WP:WIAFA 1(c) highly recommends.~~
Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.^[?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Wim van Dorst (Talk) 23:48, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 14:34, 27 November 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 06:26, 30 April 2016 (UTC)