Talk:Solar cycle 1

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This article was nominated for deletion on 29 July 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

Astronomy: Solar System Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Weather: Space Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Space weather task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Question

Why does the NASA call this "nondescript cycle"? Kope (talk) 07:03, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Huge change in max smoothed sunspot number

On 24 May 2017, Jan Janssens (STCE) increased the smoothed sunspot numbers by 66.67% (diff)

That represented a change from the SIDC version 1 convention to the SIDC version 2 convention, but there's no explanation in the article about which version it is. I propose changing this article, and the other Solar Cycle articles, to clarify that; please discuss it here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Solar_cycle_2#Huge_change_in_max_smoothed_sunspot_number NCdave (talk) 07:41, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]