Talk:Stoney (album)

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Stoney (album) is currently an Albums good article nominee. Nominated by Locust member (talk) at 02:20, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.

Short description: 2016 album by Post Malone

This article was nominated for deletion on 28 September 2016. The result of the discussion was redirect to Post Malone discography.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum

Hip-hop Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip-hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip-hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip-hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip-hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip-hopHip-hop
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): PostyMalone.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:51, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stoney (album)

The article Stoney (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

As an unreleased album with no 3rd party reliable references, this article fails Wikipedia:Notability_(music)#Unreleased_material

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cotton2 (talk) 10:23, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose deletion - Title can be redirected to Post Malone. --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:32, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jax 0677: If this article can be redirected to Post Malone, why not do that? This is not a notable article about (an unreleased album with no 3rd party reliable references, this article fails Wikipedia:Notability_(music)#Unreleased_material) and now appears that you have 3R even though I have tried to compromise be using PROD also. Cotton2 (talk) 15:57, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reply - @Cotton2:, WP:3R states "more than three reverts on a single page". Removing a proposed deletion template twice from an article might constitute eliminating vandalism, as these types of templates should not be replaced. At this point, the article should be brought to WP:AFD. --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:29, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This page should be improved and edited, not deleted because the facts are still reliable no matter the date. Shouldn't the meaning of his songs or the purpose of the album be included?PostyMalone (talk) 21:39, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@PostyMalone: This discussion is two years old, from before the album had even been released. Ss112 08:24, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Occupations or not

Umm, Andrew, why did you put rapper? He's mainly a singer. Mr.Shadow514 (talk) 18:19, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Stoney (album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Locust member (talk · contribs) 02:20, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Chchcheckit (talk · contribs) 15:39, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get to this // Chchcheckit (talk) 15:39, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good to see you again! Thanks for reviewing this one. Locust member (talk) 15:51, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·