Jump to content

Talk:Taproot (band)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Fair use rationale for Image:Taproot Blue Sky Research.jpg

Image:Taproot Blue Sky Research.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:20, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this article's content, nicknames and personal bias is all over this article, as well as this discussion page. 64.212.95.204 22:54, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


RAPCORE???

They never made rapcore! please listen to their songs first before you change it to rapcore(RAP METAL)! they just sing and never raped! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.167.213.225 (talk) 10:34, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

you've obviously never heard their pre-gift works. their first two (independent) albums (before Gift) had some rap/rock type stuff. 66.38.19.158 (talk) 20:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BTW: Rapped has two "P's". I would hope too that the fine young men of Taproot never raped either. 208.24.252.14 (talk) 20:52, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gift album name

Is the gift album just called "Gift"? on the front cover it says in blue lettering above the word gift in white: "yesterdayishistorytomorrowisamysterytodayisa..." —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dark wounds (talk • contribs) 16:22, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

it is shown basically everywhere as just 'Gift'. 66.38.19.158 (talk) 14:25, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

Holy crap this thing needs some grammatical cleanup. I'm a relatively new user, though, so how do you put a 'cleanup needed' disclaimer in an article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.86.226.30 (talk) 07:45, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]


-- Agreed. This article is terrible and doesn't conform to encyclopedic style in any way, shape or form. It reads like it was written by an eighth grader who is describing his garage band for a school report.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Taproot (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:36, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Taproot (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:48, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @T Yorke, you are currently engaged in an edit war with me on the Taproot (band) page. Please desist and discuss on the talk page instead. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 06:20, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Revirvlkodlaku, I'm just trying to add a link to the band's merch store. It says it's the official store on the band's official Facebook and Twitter pages. According to WP:SOCIALMEDIA, adding this information is acceptable. T Yorke (talk) 21:59, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@T Yorke, what is not acceptable is your edit warring. Please familiarize yourself with the topic here: WP:Edit warring. As pertains to the external link you insist on placing on the page, please read WP:External links#Minimize the number of links. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 22:18, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Revirvlkodlaku, so it's acceptable for you to edit the article but if it's anyone else it's edit warring? Please familiarize yourself with WP:OWN. Also, in the page WP:External links#Minimize the number of links, it states: "More than one official link should be provided only when the additional links provide the reader with significant unique content and are not prominently linked from other official websites." T Yorke (talk) 00:27, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@T Yorke, you are misrepresenting what has happened: you made an edit, I reverted you. So far so good. Your next step should have been to discuss on the talk page, per WP:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. Instead, you reverted back. This is how an edit war begins. I should not, then, have reverted once more, but I did; that is my bad. At this stage, we are at loggerheads: I believe I am correct in stating that the link doesn't belong, whereas you feel the opposite way. My position is that the site is a merch site, not an official Taproot site, despite what their social media states. If you feel strongly that your position is superior to mine, please seek a third opinion. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 02:27, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Revirvlkodlaku, in regards to a third opinion, it states: "This process is neither mandatory nor binding." on WP:Third opinion. I wonder why you seem so determined to keep the official store link from being in the article. The band definitely seems like they could use the help monetarily since they created a GoFundMe page to finance their upcoming album. Do you have some kind of personal issue with the band or what? T Yorke (talk) 04:24, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@T Yorke, please don't make ridiculous insinuations. I have nothing against Taproot—I used to be a big fan of theirs, once upon a time. I've already explained to you why I don't think the link should be on the page. Which part of my reasoning wasn't clear to you? If you don't wish to pursue a third opinion, you can drop the matter, but if you continue to reintroduce the link despite my stance against it, you will be creating a bigger problem than is warranted. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 06:04, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Revirvlkodlaku, yeah OK, I'm done wasting my time with you. T Yorke (talk) 06:36, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lede

Hi @User:Clay...Bill Clay, you are now engaged in an edit war with me about the wording of the lede; please stop and discuss the issue instead. I don't think it is necessary to mention that the band had other hits in the 90s. "Poem" was their most notable song, and in my opinion, it is sufficient to include that in the lede. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 07:13, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I think either keep it like this (only mentioning the 1 song) or not mentioning it at all (since it gets mentioned in the next paragraph anyway). Either way, not much use mentioning "other singles" and linking the discography page since none of those singles sadly ever came close to Poem's popularity (Calling was closest but not by much). Xanarki (talk) 17:36, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Taproot_(band)&oldid=1257943757"