Talk:Tonga Trench

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Oceans

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oceans, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of oceans, seas, and bays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OceansWikipedia:WikiProject OceansTemplate:WikiProject OceansOceans

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Oceans To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : List of oceanographers, create a comprehensive article on Concentrations of marine debris out of all the gyre and "garbage patch" articles
Copyedit : Draft:Terrance (octopus)
Expand : Coral Sea, Endeavour Strait, Greenland Sea, Solomon Sea
Photo : find images for Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in the oceans
Stubs : Oceanography stub articles, Marine geography stub articles, Aleutian Trench, Bellingshausen Sea, Caernarfon Bay, Gerlache Strait, Gulf of Oman, Iceland Sea, Draft:Terrance (octopus)
Update : Botany Bay, Wilkins Sound, Mariana Trench, Challenger Deep
Verify : Antarctic Circumpolar Current, Bering Sea, Gulf of Aden, Iceberg B-15, Ionian Sea, Japan Trench, Moreton Bay, Sound (geography), Timor Sea
Other : add ISBNs and remove excessive or inappropriate external links from Aral Sea; check La Belle (ship) for GA status; improve citations or footnotes and remove excessive or inappropriate external links from MS Estonia

Geography High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography

High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

Geology Mid‑importance

	Geology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Zealand High‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Polynesia High‑importance

	Oceania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Polynesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Polynesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolynesiaWikipedia:WikiProject PolynesiaTemplate:WikiProject PolynesiaPolynesia
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge proposal (2008)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Tonga Trench+Kermadec Trench

I propose to merge this article with the one on the Kermadec Trench, and also with the one on the Kermadec-Tonga Subduction Zone, as they are all part of the same tectonic feature. Tmangray (talk) 16:58, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is covered as Kermadec-Tonga subduction zone, there are three articles

The above discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Apollo 13 RTG

I think we need a bit more on this, if anyone has access to sources. Is it known where exactly in the trench the RTG lies? Was retrieval ever intended and would such a thing be possible? Have there been studies to measure radioactivity in the area to see if the thing is leaking? Any well-sourced information would be appreciated in the article. Beorhtwulf (talk) 15:48, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is the Apollo 13 mission relevant enough to be mentioned in the introductory part? Imo it is just a minor curiousity, possibly deserving a small note in the end of the article (but not more). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.200.200.228 (talk) 07:15, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This absolutely should not be the second paragraph. It is trivia. It should be further below the fold. Uncoolcentral (talk) 17:19, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Horizon Deep

This should have an article, being one of the deepest Deeps in the world. 70.24.244.198 (talk) 13:42, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pop Culture References

In the movie Batman vs Superman, the submersible recording had the name of the trench in the caption when Aquaman is seen. Should that be included in this article as a pop culture reference? I ask because several other Wikipedia articles make a point of mentioning them (which is how I ended up here). Thanks. Mrobviousjosh (talk) 10:53, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No - simply trivial. Vsmith (talk) 11:12, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Correction to manned dive in 2019

Article presently states: "On 5 June 2019 Victor Vescovo made the first manned descent to the bottom of the Sirena Deep in the Deep-Submergence Vehicle DSV Limiting Factor (a Triton 36000/2 model submersible) and measured a depth of 10,823 m (35,509 ft) ±10 m (33 ft).[6]"

The words "Sirena Deep" are incorrect and should be changed to "Horizon Deep." Someone made a slip. The depths are recorded in [6] as the Horizon Deep depths.

Gwyncann (talk) 04:03, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Split off: Horizon Deep (2020)

The Horizon Deep section should be split off into a separate article called Horizon Deep. It is the second deepest place in the world, and has had exploration activity, so should stand alone, just as K2, the second tallest mountain does. All the 5 Deeps and the 5 deepest deeps should all have separate articles. -- 65.94.170.98 (talk) 10:47, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No. The two short paragraphs do not rate a second article. It is simply the deepest part of the trench and is adequately covered here. Vsmith (talk) 12:27, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No. The trench is covered and that is simply the deepest known part of the trench. Beyond that there is nothing special about the deepest point of the feature. As for the K2 comparison, here Tonga Trench = K2. There is no separate "article" for the K2 summit. None is needed for this feature. Palmeira (talk) 22:55, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Apollo as second paragraph??

This is trivia, not the second most thing about the trench. It should be far below the fold. Uncoolcentral (talk) 17:18, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, didn’t see this was already being discussed. Feel free to delete this. Uncoolcentral (talk) 17:18, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Havre Trough" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Havre Trough and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 23#Havre Trough until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. —Kusma (talk) 17:02, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Colville Ridge" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Colville Ridge and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 23#Colville Ridge until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. —Kusma (talk) 17:03, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]