Jump to content

Talk:Tudor City

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Untitled

I don't think Tudor City is featured in The Jeffersons opening. It's an apartment building on 86th and 3rd Ave in Yorkville 66.9.126.26 (talk) 21:24, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Tudor City definitely does appear in the Jeffersons intro, you're not watching carefully enough. During the car ride to their new apartment (on 86th & 3rd), the corner of Tudor City place and the East end of 41st street is briefly seen. Sailorlula (talk) 06:47, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The top building

There exist(ed?) a reproduction of the top building above the massive building in Tudor City, in Mexico City. It was located in what was once a big, broad, flowered, promenade but later was turned, first into a dumb ramp next to it, then into the also massive circuito interior (18 lanes). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.134.46.50 (talk) 16:37, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary: "clarify it is next to Murray Hill (as per that article)"

As per which article? Vzeebjtf (talk) 04:33, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Four years after the edit in question, but I meant the Murray Hill article. Also, this NYT article defines Murray Hill as being south of 42nd Street from the river to around Madison Avenue (that part is a bit controversial, but it can be generally agreed that Murray Hill is immediately to the south of Tudor City, while Kips Bay is a little further south). – Epicgenius (talk) 21:43, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Tudor City/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Epicgenius (talk · contribs) 16:19, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Kusma (talk · contribs) 20:51, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Content and prose review

I will comment on anything I notice, but not all of my comments will be strictly related to the GA criteria, so not everything needs to be actioned. Feel free to push back if you think I am asking too much, and please tell me when I am wrong.

Source spotchecks

General comments and GA criteria

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed