Talk:Young v. Facebook, Inc./GA1

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs) 16:47, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will do this review.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 16:47, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

After reading the WP:LEAD and Facts section, I am impressed. However, subsequent sections seem to be sparse. I will probably have some requests for further detail. I think one section should be devoted to each of the six causes of action. I am not a legal scholar and think that the average person will get lost if you name 6 actions and have 4 sections describing them.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:11, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- After considering this article, I think it fails for lack of breadth. I would expect that each action has a section at least as substantive as the facts section. Then the two court rulings should have large sections. This article is terribly incomplete.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:40, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]