User talk:109.107.227.188

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

July 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Arabic numerals, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You are conflating "Indo-Arabic" (e.g. East Arabic) with "Hindu-Arabic". please feel free to consult the sources attached directly to the term. Remsense诉 16:53, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Arabic numerals. The name is plainly given in the attached source. Remsense诉 17:00, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What is this oppressive?? Are there names that are not used to refer to Arabic numbers, and there are no sources for them that say without good reason? Man, you are the one who behaves badly and oppressively for no good reason 109.107.227.188 (talk) 17:03, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The name is plainly given in the attached source. Remsense诉 17:03, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, the name was not mentioned and he did not explain in the first place what the numbers were. Secondly, what is this source that you claim?? Are you in your right mind to consider this as a source? 109.107.227.188 (talk) 17:07, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The source that comes directly after "Hindu-Arabic numerals". Remsense诉 17:08, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Am I talking to a child? I said, on what basis do you consider it a second source? He did not say about these numbers. This is because in all books they are called Arabic numbers, and the Indo-Arabic numbers are called Eastern Arabic numbers. Enter the links that I gave you before. 109.107.227.188 (talk) 17:10, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is cited in the source given directly after the term you keep deleting. Stop citing Wikipedia articles as sources for changes to other Wikipedia articles—that is circular. You are simply mistaken and confusing Hindu-Arabic (a.k.a. "Arabic") with Indo-Arabic (a.k.a. "Eastern Arabic") and it's wasting my time. Remsense诉 17:12, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Circular matter?? Literally, you have come to a site that has nothing to do with history and you do not even read. You just do not want to admit that you are wrong and you do not differentiate between the Eastern Arabic numbers and the Western Arabic numbers. The Eastern Arabic numbers that are called Indo-Arabic are the ones that were made after the Indian numbers and differ from the Arabic numbers. The western ones were mainly manufactured outside India and based on the number of angles 109.107.227.188 (talk) 17:38, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't demonstrated a willingness or ability to read the most basic sources. It's not my responsibility to beg you to do so.Remsense 诉 17:40, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have read the thing that you think is a source, but it is not. Secondly, you are the one who does not read at all. Arabic numbers have dozens of names now?!? 109.107.227.188 (talk) 17:42, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is not my responsibility to read a little of historical sources instead of acting in this oppressive manner 109.107.227.188 (talk) 17:43, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Remsense 诉 17:44, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Arabic numerals, you may be blocked from editing. —Small jim 17:53, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:12, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.