User talk:210.3.133.35

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Attention:

This IP address, 210.3.133.35, is registered to HGC Global Communications (Hong Kong). In the event of persistent vandalism from this address, efforts may be made to contact them to report abuse. Contact information may be available in the WHOIS report.

If you are editing from this IP address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. Sometimes, in response to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to create an account.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it may be possible for the owner of the IP to determine who was making contributions from this address at any given time.

If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log).

February 2016

Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Andromeda–Milky Way collision. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been disallowed by an edit filter. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. —SMALL JIM 12:24, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Blue jay, you may be blocked from editing. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 12:33, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Blue jay. —SMALL JIM 12:36, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SMALL JIM 12:37, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

October 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Gymnasium (school) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Gymnasium (school) was changed by 210.3.133.35 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.873549 on 2018-10-15T13:27:14+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:27, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Gymnasium (school). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Lakeside Out!-LakesideMiners^{Click Here To Talk To Me!} 13:31, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at St. Stephen's College massacre, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 05:38, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Twins (group). Thine Antique Pen (talk) 12:52, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:57, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Vicky has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Vicky was changed by 210.3.133.35 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.874492 on 2018-12-04T08:48:39+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:48, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Hello, I'm JimVC3. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Emperor Taizu of Jin have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. JimVC3 (talk) 00:01, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dick Paradise. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 00:01, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dick Power, you may be blocked from editing. – Gilliam (talk) 00:02, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. – Gilliam (talk) 00:05, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments: Blocked for 2 weeks.

November 2019

Hello, I'm James-the-Charizard. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Natalis Chan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. James-the-Charizard (talk to me!) (contribs) 14:55, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2020

Hello, I'm Gab4gab. Your recent edit(s) to the page Diocesan Boys' School appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Gab4gab (talk) 11:50, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June/July 2020

Apologies for the overload, but your two edits to Hong Kong national security law brought up a lot of red flags (if you respond, I can explain each point, but templates are here to express the standard Wikipedia view on 'don't do it again'): Kingsif (talk) 10:56, 1 July 2020 (UTC) [reply]

Hong Kong politics warnings

It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits, specifically one that you made on Hong Kong national security law, may have introduced material that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been reverted. When adding material that may be controversial, it is good practice to first discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them, to gain consensus over whether or not to include the text, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion. Thank you.

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Hong Kong national security law. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.

Please do not insert fringe or undue weight content into articles, as you did to Hong Kong national security law. An article should not give undue weight to any aspects of the subject but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to its significance to the subject. Please use the article's talk page to discuss the material and its appropriate weight within the article. Thank you.

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Hong Kong national security law. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with being blocked from editing, or other sanctions. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you.

Please do not use misleading edit summaries when making changes to Wikipedia pages, as you did to Hong Kong national security law. This behavior is viewed as disruptive, and continuation of this behaviour may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Hong Kong national security law. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Hong Kong national security law. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.

Please refrain from hijacking references as you did with Hong Kong national security law. Doing this is generally considered spamming. If you believe that a specific website is valuable to an article, then add it as an additional reference. If you continue to hijack references, you may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me on my talk page. For more, see Wikipedia:Don't hijack references.

Hello, 210.3.133.35. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Hong Kong national security law, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Specifically, this will relate in general to your editing in politics of Hong Kong articles.

May 2021

Hello, I'm Larry Hockett. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Larry Hockett (Talk) 07:34, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Larry Hockett (Talk) 07:48, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.