User talk:47.187.133.104

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

May 2021

Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Jim Sterling, especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. -- Tamzin (she/they, no pref.) | o toki tawa mi. 08:33, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jim Sterling. DanielRigal (talk) 17:31, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please be aware that using dishonest edit summaries like "‎Fixed grammatical mistakes" in order to avoid scrutiny does not work. We are not stupid. It just makes it completely clear that you are not editing in good faith. --DanielRigal (talk) 17:36, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Kirill Lokshin (talk) 23:14, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

47.187.133.104 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The majority of English speakers do NOT agree with the leftist perspective that 'pronouns are personal.' This idea is making Wikipedia a biased source against moderates, conservatives, and frankly, the majority of the population. The standard is to refer to biological males as 'he/him.' I will continue to edit articles under the guise of proxies if I must to fix EVERY instance of leftist activism that I encounter. You should feel ashamed for perverting the original intention of Wikipedia, but I know you leftist activists won't. It doesn't matter. I have truth and science on my side. 47.187.133.104 (talk) 23:17, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We don't know if you are black or not, since we can't see who is on the other end of the computer. Since you indicate you will evade your block to push your views, and not civilly collaborate with others, there is nothing else to discuss. If you don't wish to address people as they wish to be addressed, that's your business and you can deal with the consequences of that disrespect, but when editing Wikipedia we summarize what independent reliable sources say regardless of our personal views. If you are unable to do that, again, there is nothing more to discuss. 331dot (talk) 01:29, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Wikipedia:Requests for comment/RfC to adopt a default gender neutral style for policy, guidelines and help pages—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:37, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:30, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

June 2021

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Funcrunch (talk) 02:12, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Trans woman, you may be blocked from editing. Funcrunch (talk) 02:12, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page JW Player has been reverted.
Your edit here to JW Player was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://www.theepochtimes.com/prageru-censored-by-video-platform_3852182.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:17, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

November 2021

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Whitey (slang)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 15:20, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Kinu ^t/_c 21:43, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

February 2022

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 02:23, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.