User talk:ALEXP001

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

June 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Horton Hears a Who! (film), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 05:02, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Wii U, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Along with many other inappropriate lead adjustments related to reception. -- ferret (talk) 22:49, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Battlefield Hardline, you may be blocked from editing. -- ferret (talk) 00:14, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced and original research in lead sections

You're very close to a block. Despite numerous reverts by dozens of editors, you continue to make the same changes to lead sections regarding reception, in ways that aren't sourced or backed up by the article prose. In several cases, completely contradictory. In others, you have reverted the edit a few days later after being reverted. If you do not knowledge this warning and make changes to how you're editing the leads of articles, this disruption will result in a block. -- ferret (talk) 00:17, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 23:10, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. -- ferret (talk) 22:19, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]