User talk:Aashna Khanna

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

August 2012

Please do not remove the {{copyvio}} template from articles, as you did with Zee Rishtey Awards. Your action has been reverted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted, and removing copyright notices will not help your case. You can properly contest the deletion at Wikipedia:Copyright problems. If you are the owner of the material, you may release the material under the Creative Commons and GFDL licenses, as detailed at WP:IOWN. Alternatively, you are welcome to create a draft in your own words at Zee Rishtey Awards/Temp. If you continue to insert copyright violations and/or remove copyright notices, you may be blocked from editing. Psychonaut (talk) 16:19, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Aashna Khanna, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Aashna Khanna! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. We hope to see you there!

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 04:33, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Please do not remove the {{copyvio}} template from articles. Your action has been reverted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted, and removing copyright notices will not help your case. You can properly contest the deletion at Wikipedia:Copyright problems. If you are the owner of the material, you may release the material under the Creative Commons and GFDL licenses, as detailed at WP:IOWN. Alternatively, you are welcome to create a draft in your own words at a temporary subpage linked from the article. If you continue to insert copyright violations and/or remove copyright notices, you may be blocked from editing. --Mjs1991 (talk) 05:51, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove the {{copyvio}} template from articles, as you did with Zee Rishtey Awards. Your action has been reverted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted, and removing copyright notices will not help your case. You can properly contest the deletion at Wikipedia:Copyright problems. If you are the owner of the material, you may release the material under the Creative Commons and GFDL licenses, as detailed at WP:IOWN. Alternatively, you are welcome to create a draft in your own words at Zee Rishtey Awards/Temp. If you continue to insert copyright violations and/or remove copyright notices, you may be blocked from editing. Psychonaut (talk) 09:20, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Noormohammed satya for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Psychonaut (talk) 10:33, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removing copyright violation templates

Please do not remove the {{copyvio}} template from articles, as you did with the following articles:

Your action has been reverted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted, and removing copyright notices will not help your case. You can properly contest the deletion at Wikipedia:Copyright problems. If you are the owner of the material, you may release the material under the Creative Commons and GFDL licenses, as detailed at WP:IOWN. Alternatively, you are welcome to create a draft in your own words as suggested by the copyvio template instructions. If you continue to insert copyright violations and/or remove copyright notices, you may be blocked from editing. —Psychonaut (talk) and Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:40, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. —Psychonaut (talk) 13:09, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aashna Khanna. It seems that you were trying to help, but there is a big notice on the top of the CopyVio template:

Do not restore or edit the blanked content on this page until the issue is resolved by an administrator, copyright clerk or OTRS agent.

You are not an administrator, copyright clerk or OTRS agent. This means that you cannot edit those articles or remove the CopyVio templates. Please stop doing this as it can cause a lot of problems. Best wishes, Voceditenore (talk) 15:29, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for repeatedly removing copyright violation tags, after multiple warnings to stop. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:31, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages, as you did to Zee TV. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Robert Keiden (talk) 05:17, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kasamh Se, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IST (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:22, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked for a month, for the same reason as before. Considering the amount of effort that has been spent in explaining the situation to you, together with other concerns about your editing, I regard this as a minimal block. You are likely to be blocked indefinitely if you continue. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:14, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have checked the editing history of Zee Gold Awards. Ever since the article was created, it has contained substantial copyright infringing text from various sources. You repeatedly removed the copyright tag, even though copyright infringing text from more than one source still existed in the article. I am mentioning this, because, on the basis of edit summaries you have used elsewhere (though not on that article), it seems that you may think that you had removed all the copyright infringing content, and that waiting for an administrator, copyright clerk or OTRS agent to deal with the case was just a formality. It wasn't, and you must comply with the instructions in such copyright notices in future. In addition, you need to realise that repeatedly making the same edit when others undo it, known as edit warring, is unacceptable, and is itself grounds for a block. If you believe that your editing is justified, and that of other editors is mistaken, you must explain your reason, and be willing to discuss the matter. You must not simply keep repeating your edit, even if you are convinced you are right. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:50, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Following further investigation, this account has been blocked indefinitely, as it has become clear that the account is a sockpuppet account, used to evade blocks on several other accounts that you have used. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:17, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]