User talk:Aldasoro

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Welcome!

Hello, Aldasoro, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Dodi 8238 (talk) 11:41, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your request at Files for upload

Hello, and thank you for your request at Files for upload! Unfortunately, we do not have enough licensing information to upload your file. Please check the comment made at your submission here. Your request will remain open for seven days while pending a response. Regards, Nick⁠—⁠^Contact/_Contribs 17:10, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ironweb (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:

This combines a brief article about Ironweb as a thing in its own right with a heavily WP:COATRACKed article about the industry that Ironweb happens to be in. The "concept" section, for example, just outlines the general concept of what a "startup studio" is, and the "positioning" section just defines some general industry jargon -- both sections fail to actually be about Ironweb in any substantive way. And the invalid primary sources are the only ones that are actually about Ironweb; all of the reliable source coverage supports the concept content while failing to even mention Ironweb's existence at all. This is not how a company gets a Wikipedia article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ironweb and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bearcat (talk) 15:31, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Our rule on Wikipedia is that an article topic needs to be the subject of coverage in reliable media sources that are independent of the topic. Primary sources like the company's own web page, its social networking profiles or its own press releases can be used sparingly for some supplementary confirmation of facts after enough media coverage has been shown to get the company over WP:GNG, but they cannot in and of themselves demonstrate that the company is notable enough to have a Wikipedia article — our rule is that a topic (company, person, organization, whatever) can't get into Wikipedia just by writing about themselves. These days, pretty much every company that exists at all has a web presence, every person who exists at all has Twitter and Facebook and LinkedIn accounts, and on and so forth, but it's not feasibly possible for us to maintain an article about every last company and every last person that has ever created a self-published web presence. We're trying to be an encyclopedia, not a competitor to LinkedIn — so we rely on coverage in sources that are independent of the topic's own public relations efforts, as proof that people independent of the company's own PR efforts have taken notice of it. Hope that helps a bit. Bearcat (talk) 13:27, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your request at Files for upload

Hello, and thank you for your request at Files for upload! Unfortunately, your request has been declined. The reason is shown on the main FFU page. The request will be archived shortly; if you cannot find it on that page, it will probably be at this month's archive. Regards, Nick⁠—⁠^Contact/_Contribs 05:16, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ironweb concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ironweb, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:28, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ironweb

Hello, Aldasoro. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Ironweb".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 09:52, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]