User talk:Annalimbhebbi

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Abigael123 (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

July 2011

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Maja Salvador. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. -WayKurat (talk) 09:32, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Maja Salvador, you may be blocked from editing. -WayKurat (talk) 11:16, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -WayKurat (talk) 12:06, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:31, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]