User talk:Armageddon11

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Welcome!

Hello, Armageddon11, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like List of British names, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Btilm 22:21, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of British names

A tag has been placed on List of British names requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Btilm 22:21, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Todd Howard (video game designer). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- ferret (talk) 10:26, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 17:50, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Armageddon11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't realise a valid edit being considered unnecessary was "vandalism" or "disruptive editing". I'll be sure to keep in mind from now on that Wikipedia is moderated by fascist dictators. Armageddon11 (talk) 18:26, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That's enough of that. Block extended, talk page access revoked. I strongly advise anything more along those lines will result in your indefinite block. Your comment was totally inappropriate. Yamla (talk) 18:29, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

September 2019

Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Alec Holowka, especially if it involves living persons. This edit: [1] Pudeo (talk) 17:35, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notifying @Ferret: as well who blocked Armageddon11 for something similar in April 2018. Pretty disgusting to use this Wikipedia account for such defamation, especially given what happened in Holowka's case. --Pudeo (talk) 20:28, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot I even made that revert. It's awkward in hindsight. Armageddon11 (talk) 15:51, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]