User talk:Azhagiya manavalan
|
In response to your feedback
I am sorry to hear that you find those "symbols" irritating when editing. Wikipedia is currently testing on a new software that can allow easier editing with a WYSIWYG editor. You can now test its preview here. In the meantime, you can learn some of these wikitext formatting here. Do stay with us!
Hydriz (talk) 10:13, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to WikiProject Hinduism
Welcome to WikiProject Hinduism |
WikiProject Hinduism — a collaborative effort to improve articles about Hinduism Discussion board — a page for centralised Hinduism-related discussion Notice board — contains the latest Hinduism-related announcements Hindu Wikipedians — Wikipedians who have identified themselves as Hindus Portal — a portal linking to key Hinduism-related articles, images, and categories Workgroups — projects with a more specific scopes For more links, go to the project's navigation template. |
I observed your edits to Mahabharata-related articles. Upapandavas is a great first article. Few suggestions:
- restrict your use of bold to those discussed in MOS:BOLD.
- When referring multiple pages in ref, use pp. else p. e.g. p. 100, pp. 100-1. In term of the template {{cite book}}, pages parameter for multiple pages and page for single ones.
- In Bhima, I see references where name and page of reference is missing. Only ISBN is given. Please fill other details.
Let me know if you need my help. --Redtigerxyz Talk 15:38, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for the feedback. I have made the changes in Bhima; the 'page' option is missing in "Cite" template. Perhaps it is something for the software engineers to note, I had to do pp. to p. manually. I shall look into the Bold conditions shortly. Thanks again :) Azhagiya manavalan (talk) 05:12, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 05:45, 11 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.