User talk:Bermuda shawn

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Welcome!

Hello, Bermuda shawn, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as MediaMine, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! reddogsix (talk) 03:19, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of MediaMine

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on MediaMine, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 03:19, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Bermuda shawn. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article MediaMine, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Drm310 (talk) 04:41, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Indigo children, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 17:11, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indigo children

Your sources have little bearing on the topic and are wp:fringe and not wp:reliable sources. I therefore removed your addition. Jim1138 (talk) 11:26, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jim1138:Hey Jim, Isn't the whole topic of Indigo Children considered fringe? Nancy Ann Tapp was a gifted person and her work can only be replicated by people with the gift of clairvoyance or through fringe technology like AuraStar200. I am just trying to add credible support to the problems associated with diagnosing Indigo Children without the gift and using standard medical methods. I have chosen to cite the published works of two foremost experts in the field of reincarnation. 1) Dr. Ian Stevenson devoted his life to the study of children's past lives. He has studied thousands of children with knowledge of their previous life and documented how difficult it was for the parents to accept a child with knowledge and wisdom beyond their years. 2) Beatrice Brunner is the most prolific modern spiritual medium who channeled 2400 lectures over 35 years and specifically taught about the various levels that children enter an earthy incarnation. Can you please help me to make my post acceptable?Shawn Murphy (talk) 19:32, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see those sources as usable on the article. Maybe an academic double-blinded study to validate that there are actually indigo children and not just re-labeled ADHD. Perhaps start a discussion on talk:Indigo children Jim1138 (talk) 21:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]