User talk:Big slime 2000

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

November 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bad and Boujee have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bad and Boujee was changed by Big slime 2000 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.877388 on 2021-11-26T17:50:28+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:50, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Removing sourced material

Hello, I'm Ohnoitsjamie. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:18, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Instantwatym please help taking care of articles releated to "Breezy (album)". They're doing some weird stuff to it, i saw you helping many articles from these kinda attacks, do you mind keep helping?--Big slime 2000 (talk) 15:21, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:12, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:31, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Giubbotto non ortodosso per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Giubbotto non ortodosso. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 18:17, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]