User talk:Blah63

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Blah63 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Someone had been using my account on my computer since I put down for it to remember me. However, I've learned, and will no longer choose for it to remember me.

Decline reason:

All contributions on your record are vandalism, meaning that you haven't made any contributions with this username anyway. If you would like to continue, please register another username. -- Patstuart^talk|edits 12:30, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thank you for experimenting with the page Water on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Andrew_pmk | Talk 01:07, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Water

Your recent edit to Water (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 21:57, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edit to Water:

Your recent edit to Water (diff) was reverted by automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either vandalism, link spam, or test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 21:59, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Water

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Water, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Catz 22:10, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Reichman

Your article is perhaps not vandalism, but it is very close to it. You have had your final warning, and I seriously suggest that you do not implement your proposal in this article to write similar articles about other people. You WILL be blocked on the next edit of this type.--Anthony.bradbury 23:27, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted

The article Sam Reichman has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Sandstein 06:17, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings

Any more attempts to upload articles such as Sam Reichman or Sam reichman will lead to a permanent block. Please stop. --Woohookitty^Woohoo! 11:52, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Sam Reichman, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Matt Eason ^{(Talk  Contribs)} 23:27, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked as a vandalism account. Academic Challenger 23:30, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Blah63 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

69.148.241.24 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

vandal account

Blocking administrator: Academic Challenger (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Yamla 23:15, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]