User talk:Chauncey Green

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This is Chauncey Green's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Ignore the fake warnings by this serial vandal with long-term abuse, who ironically was indefinitely blocked from editing without further notice. 2600:1012:A021:4D69:586B:4CA6:CC81:1371 (talk) 03:58, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

warning?

You issued me a warning for the BKFC page. I am the primary editor and match the bout order from the official website every week. Please remove the warning with an apology or provide an explanation for the warning, which I did not receive. Marty2Hotty (talk) 09:42, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~"Please remove the warning with an apology" - absolutely not. Your edit was unconstructive, and you have been warned for the LAST time. Chauncey Green (talk) 09:46, 18 August 2024 (UTC)~~[reply]

I guess you were bored and wanted to cause trouble on Wikipedia, huh. I wonder how you randomly went to my account. Marty2Hotty (talk) 12:54, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alleged vandalism

How does changing a verb tense from past to present, to match the rest of the book's description, constitute vandalism? 67.231.67.253 (talk) 09:42, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it looks like this account has been hacked. Marty2Hotty (talk) 09:44, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~Not hacked. Just trying to deal with unconstructive editors like you. Chauncey Green (talk) 09:47, 18 August 2024 (UTC)~~[reply]

How am I being disruptive?

I simply changed the word 'Not Enter' to 'Opted out' to align with the context where the club chose not to enter the competition despite being eligible. How am I being disruptive? Gunkiet (talk) 09:43, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~Well don't. I suggest you take a break and refrain from editing that page unless you want to be blocked. Chauncey Green (talk) 09:48, 18 August 2024 (UTC)~~[reply]

August 2024

Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates, as you did to User talk:Salmoonlight. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. Salmoonlight (talk) 09:43, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He did it for my account and others as well. Please take action. Marty2Hotty (talk) 09:45, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Ridley (name), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 09:55, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop this User from threatening others and removing content without any reason in aggressive language. Munfarid1 (talk) 10:03, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~How about YOU STOP VANDALISING THEN huh?!? Chauncey Green (talk) 10:07, 18 August 2024 (UTC)~~[reply]

not an administrator

this user has undid multiple edits that arent intended to be vandalism — probably just a troll -brixk 09:45, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~Nope, just someone who despise vandals. You've been warned - heed the advice and stop being disruptive Chauncey Green (talk) 09:49, 18 August 2024 (UTC)~~[reply]

come on, i've seen your contribution list, you're not an administrator since your first contribution is undoing my revision 10 minutes ago -brixk 09:55, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~No *you* come on. You know *full well* that you're being disruptive. My advice is to cool off and take a break from editing. Chauncey Green (talk) 09:56, 18 August 2024 (UTC)~~[reply]

Vandalism?

You've flagged me and several other users for vandalism for seemingly no reason. I'm going to report this to an admin. FatPie123 (talk) 09:45, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~So you're the HORRID SNITCH then are you? Are you proud of what you are?!? Chauncey Green (talk) 10:12, 18 August 2024 (UTC)~~[reply]

Finally, a reply! I was beginning to think you didn't love me. Gotta give credit where it's due, you're persistent. Actually, I didn't get a chance to report you because someone else beat me to it.

And yeah, I am proud of what I am. I discovered someone who has even less of a life than I do.

Better luck next time Hamish. FatPie123 (talk) 15:33, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Borgenland (talk) 09:48, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confusion with vandalism warning

I was flagged for vandalism, yet as far as I'm aware, I did not disrupt the Girls Band Cry article with anything malicious and was only adding information related to the subject. May you please remove the warning or provide a credible explanation as to why the warning was issued. JT0219 (talk) 09:54, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~Actually you did quite a lot of damage to that article adding unsourced and biased info. Stop it, or you *WILL* be blocked. Chauncey Green (talk) 09:55, 18 August 2024 (UTC)~~[reply]

You flagged me as having vandalized something, and I am totally baffled

Hello,

There must be some mistake here. I did not vandalize John Goodman. I am a long-time editor with over 33,000 edits. I was simply writing that John Goodman played a director William Castle-like filmmaker in "Matinee". Please explain to me how this is considered vandalism. I am totally baffled.

Thank you. Entertainment Buff (talk) 09:48, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~No mistake. You vandalised the article, and using your established edit count as justification for doing so is frankly despicable Chauncey Green (talk) 09:57, 18 August 2024 (UTC)~~[reply]

You did not explain why my edit was considered vandalism. I was simply copying what is also listed in the Wikipedia intro for Matinee (1993 film), that John Goodman plays a "William Castle-like filmmaker". And just how do you consider my response "frankly despicable"? Please expound on that, as I am very interested in your response. Thank you. Entertainment Buff (talk) 10:12, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop egregious warnings, please

Like others above, I am baffled by your vandalism warning. It seems you are the one engaging in frivolous or egregious behavior. I am making minor edits for accuracy and editing the bio of a living US political figure. Grbb (talk) 10:00, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~Nope, not egregious. Actually entirely justified! Chauncey Green (talk) 10:02, 18 August 2024 (UTC)~~[reply]

+1--Olag (talk) 10:07, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block

I've blocked this account as it seems to be on a revert and warn spree without being able to tell good edits from bad. Ϣere SpielChequers 10:06, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~A disgusting thing to do. You should be THOROUGHLY ASHAMED OF YOURSELF Chauncey Green (talk) 10:09, 18 August 2024 (UTC)~~[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chauncey Green (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is outrageous. I am being ganged up on by a group of vandals whose edits I had been reverting. Instead of blocking them for their disruptive behaviour, I myself have now been blocked. Seems that Wikipedia is simply rules by whoever raises the loudest voice, rather than who is right. If you have any decency or sense of shame you will unblock me IMMEDIATELY so I can continue my valiant efforts against the vandals. Chauncey Green (talk) 10:01, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The gang is in the right. DMacks (talk) 10:12, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note: Any more trolling unblock requests and you'll lose access to this page. Bishonen | tålk 10:18, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Too late:) LTAs don't get a second chance. DMacks (talk) 10:22, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]