User talk:Cordeaux
Hello, "Cordeaux" and welcome to Wikipedia. A few tips for you:
- Peruse Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers and associated pages, such as
- You can experiment in the Wikipedia:Sandbox.
- Sign talk page entries with ~~~~, which is automatically converted to a name and date.
- If you have any questions, see Wikipedia:Help, or you can a question at the Wikipedia:Help desk.
- I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian.
Another tip: Do not create duplicate artices at different names; use the Wikipedia:Redirect tool. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 17:47, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Hello, Cordeaux. I appreciate your informative contributions about photography and Glaswegian topics!
You seem interested in writing some biographical articles. There's a standard Wikipedia style for such things (that you may wish to follow): the style is described at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (biographies).
Thanks again! -- hike395 14:13, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Hi Cordeaux. Germans mispronounce it just as well :-) I think your edit makes the passage too specific so I would suggest you revert it to the original phrase. --Pmkpmk 20:23, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
No it was not I who deleted the persons you queried. My only change was from 'Famous residents' to 'Notable residents' in line with the Manual of Style. Best Wishes Saga City 16:43, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Hi! As a wiki zealots who is thousands of miles away, or at least doesn't have the opportunity to get to Nardini's let alone Cumbrae these days, may I say it will be most welcome if you can restore the article. If you want your original text to work on, click on the history tab and then double click the last date you worked on it. That will bring up the old version, and you can then click on the edit this page tab to get a copy as was, which you can then paste into a text editor. Some of the reorganisation, such as having a short lead section then a geography section, looks pretty good to me. So it would be appreciated if you could go through both versions to get the best of both, rather than just reverting it back and possibly starting arguments. Your local knowledge will be a great asset, but don't forget that WP:V requires us to show verifiable sources for statements: even if it's a note of the wording of a plaque on a building (which could always be backed up by a photo if really necessary) some confirmation is needed, and of course book references or reliable web pages are ideal. So, welcome back, hope we can get everyone working together to get this article even better than ever, .. dave souza, talk 23:30, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Isle of Cumbrae
Hi cordeaux, thanks for your message. It's really a question of (a) style and (b) verifiability. What might sound OK in a travel guide or brochure is not appropriate for an encylopaedia. Phrases like "tired clichés", "cosy 1950s timewarp" and "fresh-eyed visitors" are not exactly neutral encyclopaedic tone. As for the "nostalgia-seeking 30-somethings", well, perhaps you're right but I can't say they've been obvious on my few visits to the place, and it would be difficult to provide any kind of source for this info; in other words, it's really just an opinion. Such opinions may very well be spot-on but they're not the stuff of an encyclopaedia entry. As you know stuff in WP can't include original thought or research, it must be verifiable. Must go now but WP style guides on NPOV and so forth may make the point better than I have time to -- see the welcome message at the top of this page. (Incidentally, signing your name with four tildes ~~~~ generates the effect below and makes it much easier for people to reply to your posts.)
Best wishes, Flapdragon 12:18, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Edinburgh Cameras
An editor has nominated Edinburgh Cameras, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edinburgh Cameras and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:08, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Nomination of Stephens Orr for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stephens Orr is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephens Orr until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NovaSkola (talk) 07:34, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)