User talk:Crabjam

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This is Crabjam's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hello, Crabjam!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:43, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: G.K. Stothert & Co (July 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:G.K. Stothert & Co and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 18:35, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Crabjam! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 18:35, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Crabjam. It's very pleasing to see this draft popping up on my feed. I'm not a new article patroller, but hope that after your improved referencing it will make it past the next assessment. I have taken the liberty of adding another good source from Grahame Farr. Incidentally, in the second part of that, he identifies at least sixty specific vessels built by Stotherts. Also I have parked this illustration showing the 1855 launch of Araxes in Commons for later use. Fingers crossed. - Davidships (talk) 23:19, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Great, thanks very much for that. I've read that book and should probably have included it myself! It appears that Active and Victor were referred to as numbers 278 and 280 (see https://catalogue.gloucestershire.gov.uk/records/D2460/19/2/78) and I think this was by Stothert rather than the owners so it seems possible that there are even more than are listed in the book, although I'm not going to put that in the article without good evidence. Thanks for the illustration - that will be a great addition. I'd also like to include the illustration of the works included in BIAS journal 16 (https://b-i-a-s.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/BIAS_Journal_16_STEAM_TUG_MAYFLOWER.pdf) at some point. Crabjam (talk) 06:06, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that they are indeed Stothert's numbers. Unfortunately it seems that there are no surviving archives of the company itself (unless something is lurking in the Stothert & Pitt material in the Museum of Bath at Work). The disparity between the Stothert numbers and the identified vessels is such that I suspect that, like some other shipyards, they used a single "Works number" series including their separate steam engine contracts, other fabrication work and/or shiprepair contracts - or they built a lot of small boats. I have some data on half a dozen or so missed by Farr. Davidships (talk) 12:56, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, that would make sense. I've not been able to find much in the way of company information either. I've seen a few references to the company assets being sold at auction in 1933, but nothing really in the way of leads as to where it might have gone. My main interest is the tugs they built that were used on the Gloucester and Sharpness canal - it seems that there were 11, but finding information on some of them is proving very difficult! Crabjam (talk) 19:48, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've just found out that Mayflower's 1909 boiler is No. 303,so that backs this up. Crabjam (talk) 17:11, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, Crabjam!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Crabjam! I'm CFA, and I've been assigned as your mentor. About half of new Wikipedia accounts receive a mentor chosen randomly from a list of volunteers. It just means I'm here to help with anything you need! We need to have all kinds of people working together to create an online encyclopedia, so I'm glad you're here. Over time, you will figure out what you enjoy doing the most on Wikipedia.

You might have noticed that you have access to a tutorial and suggested edits. It's recommended that you take advantage of this, as it'll make learning how to edit Wikipedia easier.

If you need assistance with anything or have any questions, click on the "Get editing help" button on the bottom right corner of your screen. This will open up a module with links to help pages and a place to ask me questions. You can also ask me questions directly on my talk page, or go here to get help from the wider community.

Again, welcome to Wikipedia! C F A 💬 03:42, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: G.K. Stothert & Co (September 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Stothert & Pitt. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It is stated to be an offshoot. It warrants merging with the parent company's article. Neither article is too long to contra-indicate the merge. Please go ahead, gaining consensus at Talk:Stothert & Pitt where felt to be necessary

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:G.K. Stothert & Co and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:26, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't lose heart! FWIW, my advice would be to draw attention to your draft at Talk:Stothert & Pitt, noting that in the draft review it has been suggested to merge it with that article. Then hope that some editors there respond to that in one way or another.

You will find data on, at present, 58 Stothert vessels in the the Shipping and Shipbuilding Research Trust's database under G K Stothert and the other iterations. - Davidships (talk) 20:55, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - definitely going to keep going with it. I've made a start on putting together a load more information to add, which will include a list of known vessels. I'll also take your advice on putting something on the Stothert and Pitt talk page. Crabjam (talk) 08:48, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations getting this into Mainspace, with welcome assistance from Andy Dingley. - Davidships (talk) 02:30, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - the links you've added have made me realise that there's loads of information missing from the Gloucester and Sharpness Canal article, so I may be resolving that next! Crabjam (talk) 06:54, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]