User talk:CycoMa2/Archive 1

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This archive is for October 2021.

The benefits of archiving your talk page

I wanted to try to get you to consider archiving your talk page.

Archiving is the preferred method of talk page cleanup.
It makes it easier to find past discussions and link to them.
There may be circumstances where it would be useful to keep older discussions present on a talk page, to avoid the same issues being repeatedly raised. However, this situation can be better addressed by use of the {{FAQ}} template.
Archiving is easy and can be done automatically by a bot.
Archiving promotes honesty and trust among the community.

No worries if you still don't want to. But if you do, I'd be happy to setup automatic archiving for you . ––FormalDude talk 05:55, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for being gone for this long

I was gone for this long because I had a trip with a few buddies of mine. We were in an area with no service, so I couldn’t do any editing. Also a bunch of users adviced me to take a break, because some of them were concerned that I was harming my social life with Wikipedia.05:09, 25 October 2021 (UTC)CycoMa (talk)

I have a lot of stuff to work on here. So many species articles, location articles, geology articles, and other stuff. I’ll try to get onto all of those.CycoMa (talk) 05:35, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mitsuhanome has been accepted

Mitsuhanome, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 00:23, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@SL93: uh oh. I didn’t realize that was still in articles for creation. Someone already made an article for that deity. The article should be deleted.CycoMa (talk) 00:42, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Epacris longiflora

Hello CycoMa,

Thanks for your work and your interest in E. longiflora. Something seems to have gone wrong with adding synonyms though - you seem to have been adding synonyms for E. impressa. The E. impressa page does need work though - there are lots of synonyms for that species. Thanks for drawing my attention to it. I will fix it. Gderrin (talk) 23:13, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Gderrin: wait are you telling me you weren’t the one who reverted the synonyms I added?CycoMa (talk) 23:18, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yep - that was me. They were synonyms of Epacris impressa (not Epacris longiflora). Gderrin (talk) 23:22, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Gderrin: I looked through the diff and I see what you mean. I have no idea how I misread it that way. I am sorry about that, I have the attention skills of a goldfish. It’s all over the place.CycoMa (talk) 23:27, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No drama at all and no need to be sorry. Making boo-boos and having other people fix them is what this thing is about. If you hadn't added those synonyms, I would not have noticed that the E. impressa page needed fixing. Please keep editing plant pages - we need more people like you. Gderrin (talk) 23:41, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Imbe clan

Hello CycoMa, do you have any idea why your article keeps krepping up in the Category:CS1 errors: unrecognized parameter? Weird I would say Lotje (talk) 16:04, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Lotje: oh that's actually a redirect. Let's just say me and another user made an article at the same time without realizing it. So we agreed to merge our articles.CycoMa (talk) 16:07, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mystery solved

Thanks Lotje (talk) 16:09, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Missouri Barnstar

		The Missouri Barnstar of Merit
		For creating several Mid-Missouri landmarks, including Fear Fest, Stephens Lake Park, and Devil's Icebox (cave). Grey Wanderer (talk) 20:41, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You keep beating me to things on my to do list, if you see anything on it that you wish to collaborate on let me know! Thanks for your Mid-Missouri work. Grey Wanderer (talk) 20:41, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Grey Wanderer: thank you very much. CycoMa (talk) 20:56, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fursona, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Urceolina urceolata has been accepted

Urceolina urceolata, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 16:13, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Split Butte has been accepted

Split Butte, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 23:22, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gration (giant) has been accepted

Gration (giant), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 00:11, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]