User talk:Deenparast

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Welcome!

Hello, Deenparast, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Dastur Jamshed Ervad Sohrab Kukadaru

The sourcing is not proper (all caps are always inappropriate), you can't use terms such as "saintly" as that violates WP:NPOV, and it needs to be wikified. Woogee (talk) 18:19, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Woogee

Thanks Woogee for your comments, I will do the needful to clean up further.

Great. Cheers. :) Woogee (talk) 03:51, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jamshedji Sorab Kukadaru‎

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.--Failosopher (talk) 18:46, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:SantKukadaruSahebGrey.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SantKukadaruSahebGrey.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 15:09, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jamshedji Sorab Kukadaru

The article Jamshedji Sorab Kukadaru has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:N

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ∯WBG^converse 11:25, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]