Jump to content

User talk:Digital Spy Poster

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Digital Spy Poster, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! 

Oh, by the way, there is an edit summary box underneath the main editing box. In there, you can type a quick summary of the edits you made, so other Wikipedians can see what you did more easily from the history page. But don't worry if you forget from time to time, we all forget stuff in our lives!

If you need any more help, ask me a question on my talk page by clicking the "talk" after my username ->. Stwalkerster talk review 19:45, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hitz Radio UK

If the article which you keep adding the "Point of View" Template to is disputed, please provide proof of disputes, just as those who argue the case have done. Do this on the talk page. Do not add a point of view Template just because YOU feel the article is disputed. IfYouCanSoCanI 14:15, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question

What's your Digital Spy account?? oh, and please post on the forums asking TEDPITMAN and PamelaL to contact me. --James gallinas 14:16, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaelyoung83 (talkcontribs)


Our cultural notability is based on three unique premises. One: we are the only UK based radio station broadcasting regular live baseball. As such, we are serving an audience of fans not previously served by any British radio broadcaster. This has already been referenced on Channel Five 3 and has the support of 8 IL clubs, the media director of MiLB and the president of the International League. Two: we are a fully licensed internet radio station. In the age of Shoutcast and various other online streaming companies, anyone can set up an illegal station. We have spent money and put effort into obtaining all the necessary licenses we need. We also have taken the first step into becoming only the second UK internet station to move onto the DAB platform, with a second step deep in planning and preparation mode. Three: in the face of a closed media run by corporations, and also tower-block and underground pirate radio stations, which allegedly serve audiences ostracised from society, we give the ordinary talented young men and women of the UK the opportunity to broadcast on a professionally run, regulated radio station from their own houses and/or studios. This includes adhering to Ofcom Codes of Conduct and similar regulations. Therefore we are providing a service in teaching young people the ins and outs of radio broadcasting, whilst introducing them to the world of media in a developing and nurturing manner. This is the crux of our argument for the keeping of our entry. If necessary, I will add all the relevant details to the article that may be needed for its survival. With regard to external sources, it's not like we've been trying. We have issued regular press releases, and it is obvious from our baseball and football projects that communications with external individuals and organisations have paid off, as well as providers of our competition prizes. This is a young but alive and breathing radio station which has a lot to offer and, given the chance, a lot to prove. Therefore, as an individual and not as an employee, I believe it merits inclusion. Michaelyoung83 22:55, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

AFD notice

Please don't remove the AFD notice once it is running. If you think it is a speedy now the AFD is running make your case for it at the AFD. --Fredrick day 04:39, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was against the rules to remove the AfD banner while the discussion is still under way. (The banner itself says this!). Only the AfD closer (not you) is supposed to remove it. I suggest you put back the AfD banner on the article and leave a note in the debate asking for it it to be extended for another five days. EdJohnston 05:23, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page User:EdJohnston on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Andrew_pmk | Talk 00:07, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]