User talk:Dustylappss
Dustylappss, you are invited to the Teahouse!
|
Hi Dustylappss! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:11, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
Your recent editing history at Islam shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:19, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Islam. BRD . Please do not war
Your recent editing history at Islam shows that you may want to engage in an edit war with me. I do not want this to happen please use the talk page before editing any further. The said article's talk page is currently being used to get a consensus among editors, of which there are four, maybe more. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war, wars do not solve problems and just create a bad image of editors. See BRD for how to engage in good editing. If you think that I am not being fair in the discussion on the talk page you can go tonoticeboard or maybe evendispute resolution. But first please use the talk page for discussion instead of multiple reverts.
And just a fair warning, without meaning any disrespect. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 07:40, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
 | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Slooppouts34 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Yunshui 雲水 08:18, 12 March 2015 (UTC) |