User talk:Ethical Content
Welcome
|
Regarding Edward Jenner
Hello! Because of your recent edits, and the edits of an IP-based user, I'll assume that you are the person behind 89.244.122.24. In that case, welcome to Wikipedia!
I've recently noticed that you made some changes on the Edward Jenner page, notably that you removed a section of text, then changed a portion of it once I reverted the removal.
First, I'd like to note that you should, as much as possible, explain why you made a change (even more so on why you removed a paragraph) in the edit summary. This helps other editors find out why you removed that part of the page. I reverted the removal of a paragraph on the first section of Edward Jenner's page because of this, though you did provide an explanation on my talk page and also instead changed some parts of the article, so there's no issue there.
Next, I'd like to address some changes made after reverting that section. Namely, you've modified his page to mention that he was the "father of vaccination" instead of immunology. Though Jenner was the father of vaccination, he is often referred to as the father of immunology since he started the discussion and documentation of the process of vaccination, a vital part of immunology. Though there are humans who discovered the concept of immunology earlier, he is widely regarded as such due to the studies published by him which were large contributions to the field of immunology.
I've changed that remark to make it standard with other biographies of Edward Jenner, but I've left the rest of your changes untouched. If you wish to return it back to "vaccination", please use the talk page of that article instead. If you have any comments, you can simply reply by editing the content of this section.
Again, welcome to Wikipedia, and I hope you enjoy your stay!
Chlod (talk | contribs) 11:13, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Copyright problem: Draft:Emerdata Limited
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Draft:Emerdata Limited, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.fastcompany.com/90381366/the-mysterious-afterlife-of-cambridge-analytica-and-its-trove-of-data https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/12/07/cambridge_analytica_crowe_llp_misled_judge_allegation/ https://www.irishtimes.com/business/technology/cambridge-analytica-chief-accused-of-taking-8m-before-collapse-1.3520609, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
- Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Draft talk:Emerdata Limited and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Draft:Emerdata Limited, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Draft talk:Emerdata Limited. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Draft talk:Emerdata Limited with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.
It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Draft talk:Emerdata Limited saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.
Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Missvain (talk) 23:24, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Emerdata Limited has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
DGG ( talk ) 10:57, 4 March 2020 (UTC)