User talk:Fokhrul 3671

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

January 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Banasree have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Banasree was changed by Fokhrul 3671 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.891596 on 2021-01-11T11:39:12+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:39, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Banasree, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:29, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Khilgaon Thana. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. In addition to observing WP:V policy, please do not mark edits as "minor" when adding content to any Wikipedia article. This flag is reserved for actual minor changes, such as a spelling correction. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:31, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Shahjalal Islami Bank Limited, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 01:37, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yamaguchi先生, this is Mohammad Fokhrul Islam, Vice President & Head of Branding and Research Department of Shahjalal Islami Bank limited. Thanks for your message regarding wikipedia page editing. I have been blocked from editing in wikipedia by you. Please let me know the reasons for blocking me. Thanks in advanceFokhrul 3671 (talk) 04:46, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fokhrul 3671 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, this is Fokhrul Islam. I have been blocked from editing content into wikipedia due to some misunderstanding. I am requesting to the relevant authority to review my status and proceed to unblock my ID.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:24, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.