User talk:GeorgeTigerZebraLeopardPeacockZOO

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

North Carolina Zoo

Shortly after your edits to North Carolina Zoo, I made a correction, but I wasn't 100% sure what was meant, so in case you don't have that article on your watch list, I invite you to review my edit and check to see that I got the intended content right. Thanks. _signed,Willondon (talk) 21:50, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hello, I'm SkyWarrior. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Cincinnati Zoo and Botanical Garden, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please note that YouTube videos, especially those from some random YouTuber and not official pages for the zoo, are not reliable sources and cannot be used to support a claim. Thank you. SkyWarrior 00:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023 Announcement

Today, we have the announcement!

All Community Posts of YouTube for the zoo will be reliable sources and could be used to support a claim!

Thank you. GeorgeTigerZebraLeopardPeacockZOO (talk) 01:02, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube just isn't accepted as a reliable source, mainly because the content is user generated and doesn't pass through any sort of editorial oversight. And it's easy to forget that reliable sources also support notability. It may be true that Celebrity Bob bought the first electric vehicle in Washington County, there's a whole video on YouTube he posted about it, but until a secondary source reports on it, it isn't necessarily considered noteworthy. I'm also getting the feeling that you may have a conflict of interest in that you are somehow affiliated with the zoo. Editing with a conflict of interest can be done, but there are ways you need to go about it. See WP:COI. _signed,Willondon (talk) 01:55, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SkyWarrior is a VILLAIN!

Skywarrior is a villain. He deletes all of my new animals and reliable sources, and then he will block me!

I have superhero strength to put all of my new animals and reliable sources back into place. GeorgeTigerZebraLeopardPeacockZOO (talk) 02:55, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Meena Kurian per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Meena Kurian. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 09:02, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]