User talk:Go!Sonic4Schools

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Go!Sonic4Schools

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Go!Sonic4Schools requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from Sonic the Hedgehog. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Amortias (T)(C) 23:07, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (your reason here) --Go!Sonic4Schools (talk) 23:12, 16 August 2016 (UTC) This is my user page and you do never ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever delete my user page![reply]

August 2016

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at William Henry Harrison.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:23, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at George Harrison. Mlpearc (open channel) 02:36, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Final Warning

Please read up on what a WP:USERPAGE is. It is not a place to copy/paste entire Wikipedia articles. They do not belong there, and it is not acceptable to copy/paste other's work and display it as your own there. Your user page is a place to write something about yourself and/or your activities at Wikipedia. Its not a place to make copies of articles. Copy/Pasting an entire article to your user page again will get your account blocked. Please stop this. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 13:08, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also note that this is nowhere near being an appropriate article, nor is it accurate to use the edit summary of "vandalism". If you read WP:VANDALISM, you'll see that your edit was completely unrelated to the concept of vandalism. Please stop recreating these terrible, short articles, or you'll be blocked for that too. Slow down and learn how to actually write an appropriate article. Sergecross73 msg me 15:39, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Captain Feathersword

‎ Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Captain Feathersword. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jena (talk) 15:11, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Your recent editing history at Captain Feathersword shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. shoy (reactions) 18:26, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

I don't believe you've made a constructive edit since you've been here, and you've refused to stop re-instating this really short, sloppy articles, leading to edit warring. As such, you are blocked from editing for 3 days. If/when you return, I hope you'll stop being so difficult and sporadic in your editing. After the block, maybe try reading up on WP:WIKIPEDIAADVENTURE and/or WP:5P to learn more about better ways to contribute to the website. Sergecross73 msg me 18:31, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

22 August 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at George H. W. Bush. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. douts (talk) 18:25, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 18:33, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]