User talk:Godstar23

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Welcome!

Hi Godstar23! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! --Botpy (talk) 03:18, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the September 11 attacks. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 18:44, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at IM1, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please see what is not vandalism for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:17, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking material

Please quit removing material that is even stated by the Scientific American source. You also have zero reasons to be blanking a source and are bordering on vandalism. You are not re-wording my edits, but completely undoing them! -- Kheider (talk) 19:22, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would argue that you were the borderline vandal, for repeatedly changing Dr. Loeb's claims. In any case, the article seems to have finally been edited to very clunkily reflect both points we were trying to include, so I hope we can both be miserable now.

With love and squalor,

Godstar23 (talk) 16:26, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aurora Theseus moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Aurora Theseus. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 21:56, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]