Jump to content

User talk:Gokufistum

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Welcome!

Hello, Gokufistum, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- The Red Pen of Doom 18:28, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Feb 2007

A tag has been placed on Beans & Weenies (Camp Lazlo), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. If you plan to add more material to the article, I advise you to do so immediately. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mr.Z-mantalk 00:56, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Beans & Weenies (Camp Lazlo). If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you.Mr.Z-mantalk 01:10, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I put the speedy deletion template on Beans & Weenies (Camp Lazlo) because it does not "assert the importance or significance of its subject" and it consists entirely of run-on sentences. Mr.Z-mantalk 01:10, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I find this article to be a good representation of what a TV episode article should look like. Also, the information in Beans & Weenies (Camp Lazlo) can already be found in List of Camp Lazlo episodes#Season 1: 2005. Finally, please sign your posts on talk pages using 4 tildes ~~~~ to produce your signature. Mr.Z-mantalk 01:23, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Xiaolin Showdown

The episode articles don't need succession boxes at the bottom of the page, they're built into the infobox. Jay32183 22:22, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Pandabubba

An editor has nominated Pandabubba, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pandabubba and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 09:48, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of ICarly (season 1)

A tag has been placed on ICarly (season 1) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jenuk1985 | Talk 22:39, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary for your edits. When you make major changes as you did here [1] without indicating a reason, it appears to be vandalism. Thank you. -- The Red Pen of Doom 18:29, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

STOP all I see you doing is removing stuff like criticism, and adding the season and changing the color. CTJF83Talk 18:23, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your comments on User talk:Ctjf83: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. CTJF83Talk 18:30, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on Template:Family Guy. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. CTJF83Talk 18:36, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:Three-revert rule. Your comment here is a nonsensical attempt to game the system, since the edit is identical to the article version to which you have been reverting, regardless of what button you pushed. Even reverting up to 3 times is discouraged—please use talk page discussion when it is made clear that the edit you intend to make does not enjoy consensus.

The talk page for that edit is Template talk:Family Guy. / edg 19:24, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to mark your edits as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' Thank you. / edg 19:41, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.
The duration of the block is 24 hours. Here are the reverts in question. William M. Connolley (talk) 20:24, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:True Jackson, VP has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:10, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Samantha Who? has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. -happy5214 08:10, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]