User talk:Gulugawa

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Gulugawa, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Gulugawa! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:18, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents post

I have mentioned you in an Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents post — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.15.78.1 (talk) 05:01, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SPI

Rather than reporting block evasion at WP:ANI, which can result in a lot of shouting, I suggest reporting it as sock-puppetry at WP:SPI. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:38, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rise of Nations may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

RTS games; this includes a knowledge of the troops and what they are good at fighting. For example ([[pikemen]] are better than [[cannon]] at killing [[cavalry]]. Terrain plays a major part in this

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:31, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello there. I think you avoid editing the Suburban Express article directly, so it seems logical that you would also avoid editing the owner's article as well (Dennis Toeppen). Wouldn't the COI extend to both articles? Anyhow, I left a note at the talk page there. I see you've been guarding against sockpuppets, which is fine and good. I'm concerned the content there could be slightly non-neutral as you've put it back in. For example, "only to reinstate many" seems to take a bit of a dig at the subject. But perhaps I missed that in the source. Best. Biosthmors (talk) pls notify me (i.e. {{U}}) while signing a reply, thx 20:33, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]