User talk:Hockeystu2
That's a great bit of info to add, but can you find a source saying this? Brianyoumans (talk) 03:37, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Worlds first 80+ hockey tournament, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:43, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
Your article submission Worlds first 80+ hockey tournament
Hello Hockeystu2. It has now been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Worlds first 80+ hockey tournament.
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Worlds first 80+ hockey tournament}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:04, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
- The "Articles for creation" draft you made is never going to be acceptable as an article unless it is drastically rewritten, for at least two reasons. Firstly, it is written as a personal reflection, rather than an objective report. Secondly, there does not seem to be the remotest trace of evidence anywhere that the tournament is notable enough to be included. (I am basing that not only on the fact that the draft you wrote provides no evidence of notability, but also on the fact that I have searched, and found no evidence of notability anywhere.) The first of those two problems can easily be dealt with by rewriting, but the second one is a different matter, because no amount of rewriting an article about a subject will change the degree of notability that the subject itself has. You are, of course, free to pursue it if you like, but my advice is that you will be wasting your time, and will be better off spending your efforts on something else. If you are interested in contributing to Wikipedia, there are millions of other subjects on which you can edit. If, on the other hand, you are only interested in trying to publicise that tournament, then you are much more likely to be successful in doing so by putting time into getting publicity on either a web-hosting service or a social network site. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:27, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Zeb Turner
Hi, I recently reverted your good faith edit at Zeb Turner. While I did see your note at the Help Desk, Wikipedia does not allow original research. That is, simply because you have experienced something, does not make that information worthy of inclusion. As with any encyclopedia, we want information that can be verified. Since nobody can access a library and check out your brain, or cross-check your memories with other sources, that makes the verification process difficult. No disrespect intended, I do not question your veracity, I'm only pointing out that your contribution does not yet meet our encyclopedic needs. Now if your memories had been recorded in a published reliable source or recounted on The Tonight Show or whatever, that would be a different story. In the future, it might be a better approach to leave your comments locally on the article's talk page so that editors interested in Turner could respond directly to you. The Help Desk is for general questions related to the use of Wikipedia. Posting your ideas on the Zeb Turner talk page will help insure that your thoughts are directed to the interested parties. Good luck! 
Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:52, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Worlds first 80+ hockey tournament, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Worlds first 80+ hockey tournament
Hello Hockeystu2. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Worlds first 80+ hockey tournament".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Worlds first 80+ hockey tournament}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 00:01, 17 March 2014 (UTC)