Jump to content

User talk:Hrotovice

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Hello, Hrotovice, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! Snowded TALK 19:47, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help


Please note that the British Isles article is under a 1RR restriction, reverting a revert (as you did today) could lead to a block. Please use the talk page --Snowded TALK 19:47, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have now reverted three times and made a silly accusation. Do it again you get reported for a block --Snowded TALK 07:19, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Per the notice on the top of Wikipedia:Deceased Wikipedians, please do not add people unless you can supply verifiable information that they have died. I have removed the two entries that you added. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:19, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: Again, per the notice at the top of the page, do not add people unless you can supply verifiable information that they have died. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:24, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
As I understand it, Teenly did actually die. Anyways .... - Alison 00:52, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shall I report thee?

How come it is ok for you to revert THREE times in a 24 hour period and then revert my edit as vandalism with the comment about a 1RR? I'm sure there is a name for this....can you guess? Bjmullan (talk) 22:59, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You can report me if you want, but you should realise this. You made a bad edit and I reverted it. This, I believe, is part of the WP:BRD process, so you are bold, I revert, then you ... revert again, but you should have discussed. You used incorrect apostrophes and you seem to have a POV about not using words such as Republic of Ireland. In taking them out you left text that was bad to understand and maybe even wrong. I am reverting the most recent edit of ClemMcGann, who is a non-contributor as far as this is concerned. Maybe you should now put your points on the Talk page and I'll do the same. Hrotovice (talk) 14:45, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
As well as being bold you should assume good faith WP:FAITH. I have no problem with using ROI were it is in the correct context but you edit is inaccurate as it misses out ports in the north. CIL as point out in the summary of my edit is a cross border organisation. Please be aware the if you break the 3RR I will report you without further warning. Bjmullan (talk) 20:47, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yo!

How's things? You owe me emails, dude ^_^ - Alison 00:53, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BI Peer Review

Hi Hrotovice, you asked about the location of the peer review on British Isles - it's here. One thing that leaps out to me is that the reviewer is familiar with the Atlantic Archipelago phrase, which surprises me - I haven't come across a single person from a fairly wide circle of knowledgeable friends so far who has ever heard of it before! Jamesinderbyshire (talk) 13:25, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Appealing blocks

I'm afraid that creating an alternative account is not the proper method for appealing a block. See Wikipedia:Appealing a block for more information on appealing a block when your talk page is protected. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:06, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]