User talk:IKR1

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Welcome!

Hello, IKR1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Karm a fist 05:04, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Afd

You removed the AFD sticker on Rough Science Boys, please do not it again as it is considered vandalism. As well, by just taking the sticker off, it does not do anything to prevent the article from getting voted on for deletion. Croat Canuck 05:22, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cinemascope

I re-edited the Anastasia section that you wrote on Cinemascope, because while it was indeed credited in Cinemascope, it was not actually shot with it. It's a bit confusing, but has to do with trademarks, Don Bluth's personal proclivity, and the technical limitations of Cinemascope lenses that would make using them for animation all but impossible. Let me know if you have any concerns with the edits. Thanks! Girolamo Savonarola 21:41, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Doogal

Please do not re-add Doogal to the page at Films considered the worst ever before discussing it on the talk page of the article. It was released less than a month ago in the US, and that fact alone makes it unlikely to be labelled a "worst ever" at this time. Also, finding a quote from a major movie critic labelling it as a "worst ever" would go a long way towards the argument of including it on the page. Thanks. Turnstep 15:07, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ice_age_meltdown.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ice_age_meltdown.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 11:24, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copy and pastes

Please don't copy and paste from other websites. Copyright violations are illegal, even from IMDb. If you have done this in the past, please go back and remove that text. CanadianCaesar Cæsar is turn’d to hear 21:23, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IMDB ratings in the infobox

Hi, I notice that you replaced the IMDB rating in the film infoboxes on Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones that I had previously removed. I'm not convinced that this is at all a good idea, and what little discussion there has been of it (see Template talk:Infobox Film#IMDB Ratings) supports this. If you think otherwise, perhaps it would be productive to state why on that page? Regards, Ziggurat 04:20, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:SR image 1.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:SR image 1.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:08, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:SR_image_2.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:SR_image_2.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:05, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NOR

Wikipedia has a policy against original research. For this reason, I reverted your guess as to why the release date for Clerks II was changed. --Yamla 21:20, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Clerks II, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Yamla 01:43, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ice age meltdown.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ice age meltdown.jpg but you have forgotten to include a detailed fair-use rationale for your use of this image. Without that, I'm afraid we may have to remove the image. Sorry. --Yamla 21:22, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All copyrighted images uploaded to Wikipedia must be done so under a fair use rationale, mentioning why that copyrighted image must be used. (Free alternatives are preferred, but in some cases, you must use a copyrighted image to get your encyclopedic message across.) You must make sure all images you upload under fair use contain such rationale. Please see Wikipedia:Fair use for details. Tangot a ngo 02:33, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please let me know if you are going to go back and fix all of the images you have uploaded. Many of them (for example, Image:MulhollandDrivePoster.jpg) could easily have a fair-use rationale provided. Without this, though, we are going to have to reject your images. Please let me know right away what you intend to do. Thanks. --Yamla 05:00, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Image:Chocolate web.jpg article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! Please note that just using photoshop produce some minor changes to a copyrighted image does not mean that the copyright is no longer held by the original author. --Yamla 01:46, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Significant problems

I NEED EVEN MORE HELP! AND I NEED WIKIPEDIA TO ADVERTISE MY FILMS!

Sorry, Wikipedia is not to be used for advertising. --Yamla 05:03, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not to be used for "films" such as Chocolate's Web or Rough Science Boys: The Movie. This is completely inappropriate. In addition, virtually all of your image uploads have been blatant copyright violations or images without source, without license, or without any mandatory fair-use rationale. Until you have fixed all these images, please do not upload any further. Wikipedia takes copyright violation very seriously. Additionally, I do not want to see you creating any more articles for "films" you have released or plan to release on YouTube. This is your last warning. --Yamla 01:51, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the user is referring to your articles, which he/she thinks violates the notability, and possibly the verifiability guidelines. Please make sure your articles follow these, as they are policy. Also, all images you upload should have a valid source/copyright description. Please see Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for that. Cheers, Tangot a ngo 02:31, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IKR1, your addition of quotes and songs to the Chocolate's Web page is even less appropriate. Please do not contribute any more content to Wikipedia until you have read WP:N and WP:NOT. I appreciate your desire to advertise your "films" but Wikipedia is not the place for it.

TfD nomination of Template:IKR

Template:IKR has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Tangot a ngo 05:16, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, what do you need help with? - Tangot a ngo 16:48, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Charlotte's Web (1973 film)

Please stop mentioning your non-notable "films" in other, legitimate articles. Wikipedia treats articles very seriously and such edits are not helping the encyclopedia. You have already been warned several times; If you continue, your editing privileges may be revoked. Thanks, Tangot a ngo 16:53, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Helpme

Please stop using the {{helpme}} request. You are just wasting time. --Yamla 18:45, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll just note that you are free to use the {{helpme}} request for legitimate requests, it's just that you have been using it excessively recently, particularly when all the answers you seek have already been posted here. --Yamla 19:09, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pages nominated for deletion

You said: "This dosent make any sense! Im trying to spread the word of my movies and the're up for deletion? What makes you so special to delete my films?"

First, as has been repeatedly pointed out to you, Wikipedia is WP:NOT to be used for advertising. Secondly, as has also been repeatedly pointed out to you, your films are simply not notable. Additionally, they are blatant copyright infringements of the original movies. Finally, anyone can nominate any page for deletion. Of course, if you do so without justification, you'll be blocked. But as you can see, the common consensus is that these pages are not worthy of Wikipedia articles. Please go and read WP:NOT and WP:N. One final note, if you really are 11 years old, you are violating YouTube's conditions of use as well. --Yamla 18:55, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removing tags

Do not remove tags from articles without resolving the underlying problem. Edits such as this one are blatant vandalism and if I catch you doing this again, you will be blocked. This is your last warning. --Yamla 19:03, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rough Science Boys: The Movie

I have speedy deleted Rough Science Boys: The Movie, as a recreation of deleted material (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rough Science Boys). Do not recreate the article. The correct process is to undertake Wikipedia:Deletion review, but considering that the AfD discussion the outcome probably won't be favourable for you.

By the way, the Removing_tags section above is rubbish, you were perfectly correct to remove the Prod tag. I will speak to the editor.--Commander Keane 07:33, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Yet another article you have created has been nominated for deletion. This time, it is for Chocolate's Web Song Lyrics. If you do not stop creating non-notable articles, you may be blocked permanently. Instead of creating these articles, why not stop and consider contributing productively to the Wikipedia? --Yamla 22:00, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chocolate's Web notability assertions

Greetings! I notice something missing from the Chocolate's Web article which is necessary for inclusion in Wikipedia: links to the independent reviews of the movie or other similar items that establish the notability of this web content. Without such information, Wikipedia policy does not allow the articles to remain on the site.

That rule is in place to be fair to everybody; all articles have to meet the criteria to stay up. I'd love to see articles about a couple of my creations, "Saturn Disturbance" and "The Day of the Rubber Chicken," but they never were big enough to get a newspaper write-up, never got a review by a columnist, so until I go out and promote them elsewhere and make them that well known, they won't go on Wikipedia.

Which brings me back to Chocolate's Web: can you point me toward some reviews of the movie or something similar, done by other people, to establish that the movie is noteworthy enough to have an article on Wikipedia? If the reviews are out there, I'm willing to help you keep the article up. If they aren't, then I have to go along with the rules. —C.Fred (talk) 23:48, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Crystal ball

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. This edit was reverted. --Yamla 16:32, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked for 24 hours. You have been told over and over and over and over and over again that you cannot use Wikipedia for advertising or for non-notable content. This addition of your "film" to the List of animated feature films is entirely inappropriate. This is particularly the case because your "film" is not a theatrical release, nor a made-for-tv release, nor a direct-to-video movie. It is also possible, though I'm not at all sure on this point, that your "film" is also less than 40 minutes long. Additionally, films, if appropriate, must be added in alphabetical order. Combined, these violations and your continual blatant advertising and vanity articles necessitate this block. --Yamla 16:47, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Email

IKR1, I would like to contact you via email to discuss a couple of issues. You do not have your profile tied in to a user account and so I cannot contact you directly. Additionally, I would ask that you please consult with a parent or teacher before doing so (this is a good general policy). If you prefer, I am quite happy to converse here instead but would rather keep the conversation private through email. That said, I would of course encourage your parent(s) or teacher(s) to read the email. I would just like to explain the problems with your movies and the reasons why many of your edits are reverted here on Wikipedia. Please let me know. Thanks. --Yamla 18:30, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:About a boy poster.jpg)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:About a boy poster.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. meco 17:04, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:AntwoneFisherPoster.jpg)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:AntwoneFisherPoster.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. meco 17:06, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Gangs Of New York poster.jpg)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Gangs Of New York poster.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. meco 17:12, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Quiet American movie.jpg)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Quiet American movie.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. meco 17:14, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:MulhollandDrivePoster.jpg)

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:MulhollandDrivePoster.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. meco 09:16, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Tatcdvd.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tatcdvd.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 22:14, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:The da vinci code final.jpg

Please write a detailed fair use rationale for this image, including its source information. Cbrown1023 00:08, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Cars_High-Rez_Final_Poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cars_High-Rez_Final_Poster.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:57, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:FootloosePoster.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:FootloosePoster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 23:27, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Napoleondynamite.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Napoleondynamite.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:04, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Herculesone-sheet.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Herculesone-sheet.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- SilentAria ^talk 00:09, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Herculesone-sheet.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Herculesone-sheet.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:09, 3 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- SilentAria ^talk 00:09, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Thelittlemermaidplatnuimedition-finalcover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Thelittlemermaidplatnuimedition-finalcover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. szyslak 04:30, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:PlanetoftheapesPoster.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:PlanetoftheapesPoster.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eachwiped 05:13, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:1122Marchofthepenguinsf+m.jpg‎

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 16 October 2007, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Llorcs 20:30, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Pebbleandthepenguin.jpg‎

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 16 October 2007, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Llorcs 20:30, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Titan AE One Sheet.jpg‎‎

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 16 October 2007, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Llorcs 20:30, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Potd.jpg‎

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 16 October 2007, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Llorcs 20:30, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:JUN044233.jpg‎‎

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 16 October 2007, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Llorcs 20:30, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Potd.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Potd.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:32, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:The Human Stain poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:The Human Stain poster.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Petramis (talk) 08:23, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LOTRROTKmovie.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:LOTRROTKmovie.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:39, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Potaending.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Potaending.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:14, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Star wars episode three poster2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Star wars episode three poster2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 10:20, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Pebbleandthepenguin.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Pebbleandthepenguin.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 01:46, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cars image 2.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cars image 2.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:05, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FootloosePoster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FootloosePoster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:37, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]