User talk:Ichormosquito

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Your recent edits to Ben Going, Oldboy, The Spirit

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Ødipus ^sic 08:46, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try. Ichormosquito 08:52, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mark David Chapman

Please, if this was you, don't make any more edits like that one. --Guinnog 03:11, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was an experiment. I'm allowed an experiment. Ichormosquito 03:35, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alyson Hannigan

LOL* The info about the false sex tape used to be in the article, but it was removed some time ago. -Duribald 12:58, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the youtube gospel according to ichormosquito

apologizes. sorry for any confusion. it's starting to read like we are arguing about articles' neutrality. i happen to enjoy youtube and various users and contributors to the site. i am not going to restate my feelings on certain criteria because i am sure you understand most of my view point. i think it's cool that you research into youtube and create material for this online encyclopedia. maybe someday you'll write about me, who knows. i prefer to keep it all civil and open lively debate. in order, to best figure out what is viable [1] TomSkillingJr.

RE: Brookers Info Box

Haha, I didnt know that color was that important. Allthough in my opinion, red isn't a great color for it, hence I changed it.

I changed it to #ccf, what do you think? Yeahwhynot 16:45, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello...

Well, I'm contributing some articles about YouTube like you. I started many YouTube celebrities' articles on Turkish section. Maybe we can help our contribs. Onur T^contribs 16:13, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm planning to start the article of Grup Tekkan. They've a German Article. Onur T^contribs 19:45, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

prodwarning

Ben Going

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Ben Going, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Sexyorge

Good detective work

I think all the delete votes are coming from one user, good investigative work, turn on your email so we can send each other email. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 05:11, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

?

i came here to respond to the personal attack on my talk page. you see paranoid about people using multiple accounts. when many people disagree with you do you always think that its the same person? regarding you accusation of vandalism and threatening me with blocking (a power that i believe is not yours) i was simply trying to make the page you mention more realistic and more reflective of the subject and less like a fansite. please read up on civility thankyou.

Shoopshoop 20:06, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, your edit to Caitlin Hill was vandalism, plain and simple. Ichormosquito 20:22, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Going

I actually have no opinion on the article itself--not my field. Sorry, but I can't really help more. DGG 15:30, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox_Internet_celebrity

I added the Nationality function to the Internet celebrity template. I have a few ideas to add other things as well if you want to discuss it! | Yeah why not? | » Reply » | 12:45, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Haha yeah, I know all too well. What I was thinking, is add a section for a fansite link and a chatroom, seeing as a lot of e-lebrities have these to communicate with their fans.

What are your thoughts? | Yeah why not? | » Reply » | 13:24, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments on Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ben_Going

Hello, it is my obligation to try to resolve this issue with you in a civil and personal manner. Simply put, I take extreme offense to your "shoot first, ask questions later" attitude towards users voting for the deletion of the Ben Going article. More specifically, your constant accusing of me and other editors of being trolls, liars, meatpuppets, sockpuppets, and single purpose accounts, contrary to existing evidence that they are, in fact, not. I have already said this on the AfD page, but I'll say it again here - in accordance with WP:AGF and WP:CIVIL, please cease these hostile accusations immediately. If you have reservations about a particular user, there are more civil ways to go about voicing them than blatantly calling them trolls or meatpuppets. I hope you'll work with me on this. Thanks, cacophony ◄► 06:55, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Some examples... I'd consider "while the YouTube community spun the ordeal into a meme" sourced by a YouTube search to be original research; i.e. it is being asserted by a list of videos that this constitutes a meme. To me that is an original synthesis; you'd really need a source that refers to it specifically as a meme. Moviepicturefilm.com is another site that I would use sparingly. I don't know if it exactly meets WP:RS. I'm not saying it should be completely expunged, but I'd be sparing in what I'd source from that.--Isotope23 18:21, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism

Ichormosquito, i was hoping to get some more background on why it's necessary to "flesh out" youtube on wikipedia. will there ever be standards for youtube celebrities? it's obvious we have different opinions on what celebrity is. my main argument is most of these articles on "youtube celebrities" read like resumes or advertisements for their careers. do you have a basic outline of what you feel is notable for these type of people. please feel response in any form. i was just hoping to hear about the importance of fleshing out youtube's presence. also correct if i am wrong but boh3m3 does beg for money in his vlogs. how it is vandalism to note that ? Sexyorge 21:47, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

furthermore, sorry if i don't sound civil or my tone is being mistaken for something else. i was hoping to hear your opinion on this topic. regardless its fine either way. here is my further discussion on topic.

http://www.boh3m3.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=2162

"Over the next few days, Wikipedia should allow editors to work on Boh3m3's entry. It's been protected in order to prevent further editing for a while now; but I'm fairly confident I can bring it back, at least temporarily. Since I don't know as much about him as some of you do, I'll need your help.
Boh3m3's deleted page
Page undelete discussion
We might need to write an article off of Wikipedia first before handing it to admins for approval. If you want to get started now, keep in mind nearly every bit of info must be sourced. Ideally, any pictures must be taken by YOU or signed off on by their creators.
EDIT: Page is back. We still need a picture of boh3m3 that has been signed off by its creator for noncommercial use: see the licensing information under Smosh's or Barats and Bereta's picture for a better idea of what I'm talking about. Pictures you might have taken of him at "As One" are acceptable."
— ichormosquito post on boh3m3 personal forum

that is my entire argument on why the article is bias, advertising and needs review. thanks Heideggger 17:49, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I created an account at boh3m3.net for that exact purpose. I have 4 posts there. There is nothing wrong with trying to recruit experts to help with writing an article. There is far from anything wrong with that. If I wanted to, I could have had hoards of boh3m3 fans find their way to the AfD, but I didn't. In fact, the exact opposite happened. Stop taunting me, and read up on WP:CIVIL. Thanks.Ichormosquito 21:59, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Wine Kone

Is it possible to use the photo found on the YouTube Stars gallery? I also found this tidbit about his age. http://www.ljtop.com/the_birthday_of_all_birthdays_125986184.html. Skyllo01 01:30, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the link in his wiki, you'll see his interview with youtubestars. then in that site there is a gallery of youtubers and he has a picture there. by the way, i also found this: http://www.ryocenter.com/awards/youtube.html. Skyllo01 03:56, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One more link: http://www.ryocenter.com/awards/coolpeople2006/. It made me laugh. "Super cool" Skyllo01 04:01, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nalts Image

Of course I have permission to use the image of Nalts. You want me to contact Kevin, ask him, and forward it to you? I would be more than happy to do so as long as it keeps you from removing it for absolutely no reason.

Defender of the Wiki!

		The Mighty Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to Ichormosquito in recognition of invaluable monitoring and defense of List of YouTube celebrities. Thank you for your efforts, and congratulations. --Absurdist 03:46, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote something stupid in response to this a little while ago, but then an image I included was deleted. No matter: just a sincere thanks! Ichormosquito 08:40, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar and Wieringo

Wow! Thanks! That was so thoughtful! --69.22.254.111 17:44, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spells in Harry Potter

Hey, this article has been nominated for deletion again, would you mind swinging by and defending it as you did so staunchly last time? Looks like it could really use the help! GlassCobra 01:46, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Canvassing

Thanks for the heads up. I'll make sure to keep my wording more neutral in the future. GlassCobra 07:06, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AFD for Spells in Harry Potter

Hello. I just wanted to tel you know something regarding this comment of yours at the AFD for Spells in Harry Potter. Please note that canvassing is unacceptable and that AFD is not a vote. Happy editing! --Boricuaeddie 03:05, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CANVASS states, somewhat ambiguously, that there are editors who think notifying both parties in a debate may be acceptable. ichor}mosquito{ 04:18, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is currently under a deletion review. Therequiembellishere 17:14, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Happyslip

Don't worry, I deleted it myself because I moved it to a temp folder I'm using for these purposes ;) cheers --Outspan 10:50, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, what was the google query you used to find the references, so that I can use it to improve the article? thanks --Outspan 14:39, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing signature

I find the use of } and { in your signature distracting and confusing per Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing your signature, especially because of their reverse order. It looks to me like somebody is trying to emphasize, refactor or group text outside your signature. I saw your signature at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Happyslip where it's repeated many times. Would you consider changing it? PrimeHunter 14:49, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The colors you chose also are visually difficult to look at. The multiple posts at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Happyslip really brings this issue out. Would you consider changing the colors used in your signature to something less intense? -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 17:24, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree. Very difficult to understand and read Apelike 00:45, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Argh. Ichormosquito 21:08, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for changing it. PrimeHunter 01:17, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Happyslip in DYK?

Hi, I just wanted to let you know that, as suggested by User:Jreferee, I nominated Happyslip for DYK [Did You Know?]: see here. The article is also a B-Class now (see Talk page). If it succeeds, however, it will be put on main page in a day or two, so let's keep in contact through the talk page ;) cheers -- Outspan [talk · contribs] 23:13, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome, man! I'll do what I can to help. Ichormosquito 02:01, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ken Stein

Sometimes you need to be a jerk to talk to a jerk. Considering his actions and comments towards me, is it appropriate for me to noticeboard him. Sasha Callahan 05:52, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DRV

I have initiated a deletion review of an AFD which you were involved in. You may wish to contribute to the discussion. Balancer 04:53, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Nalts.JPG

An image that you uploaded, Image:Nalts.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 13:35, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it from the page but will try to get in contact with the Flickr user. I didn't realize whether or not a pic be noncommercial is an issue, so long as it has a CC license. Oh well. Ichormosquito 15:31, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for getting the release - I verified the license and uploaded the image at Commons with a "reviewed" template. That way we can keep the image even if the photographer changes the license at Flickr in the future. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 14:06, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, we can take CC "attribution" and "ShareAlike" licenses. NC and NoDerivs are unfree so far as Wikimedia is concerned, I'm afraid. Thanks again! Videmus Omnia ^Talk 14:10, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uphill battles...

As per your comment in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Crocker (Britney Spears Fan) - I love uphill battles too.. Have you considered to joining the Article Rescue Squadron? - Fosnez 04:58, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds fun! Ichormosquito 05:11, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just added my keep !vote. Check it out, Ichormosquito. It might tip your decision. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 06:33, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :-) Fosnez 08:10, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Crazy robot

Thanks for the intervention at Image:Happy Slip Logo.JPG. You may want to read my post at Betacommand. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 05:55, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It seems the whole thing was my fault. Still, those bots can be pretty annoying sometimes. Ichormosquito 05:33, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Last Word

I would just like to say thanks, I need a laugh. Fosnez 05:46, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I love that essay; I'm glad it worked! Ichormosquito 05:58, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen King IPC

Exactly my point. Removing all the indiscriminate list of trivia, all that was left was the opening paragraph. One paragraph is too short for a daughter article, so I merged what I could in. Will ^(talk) 11:04, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

why did you remove renetto stuff?

what was wrong with it? It was perfectley fine. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.161.208.19 (talk) 23:23, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You mean this? The link didn't go anywhere... Ichormosquito 02:42, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GlassCobra's RfA

		My RFA
		Hey man! Thanks for your support in my request for adminship, which ended with over 9000 supports, 3 opposes, and 1 neutral. I hope your confidence in me proves to be justified, and please feel free to call on me if you ever need any help or opinions! Also, I saw that you kept that vandalism, and I had a good chuckle. :) GlassCobra 02:15, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That couldn't have gone better even if you had received over 9000 supports. Congratulations on a thoroughly successful RfA! Ichormosquito 04:16, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanksgiving

Hello Ichormosquito. Please refrain from removing sourced information from articles. In the United States, Thanksgiving was established as a holiday to give thanks to God for blessing the nation. This fact is clearly shown by the First Thanksgiving Proclamation (the establishment of the holiday) as well as subsequent proclaimations. Please read the quotes on the article before reverting sourced information. With regards, Anupam^Talk 19:42, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, it grammatically makes no sense to give thanks without having an object of that verb. With regards, Anupam^Talk 19:45, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, you are incorrect. Every president's thanksgiving proclamation from Abraham Lincoln to George W. Bush has included thanking God in his address. As far as I know, they have not thanked any of the other deities that you have mentioned. Nevertheless, I have looked at your recent compromise and feel that is acceptable for the article. With regards, Anupam^Talk 21:32, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Spiritcircle.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Spiritcircle.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:35, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Crocker1.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Crocker1.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Save-Me-Oprah ^(talk) 14:45, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Crocker1.JPG

Hi there. Another editor has since made the Fair Use Rationale acceptable. Thank you! Save-Me-Oprah ^(talk) 12:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of YouTube celebrities

An editor has nominated List of YouTube celebrities, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of YouTube celebrities (3rd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:59, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Ichor...

Just checking what were you doing. I started the article of Gürman siblings on Turkish wiki. Feel free to check at "tr:Gürman Kardeşler". I'm planning to write its English version. Onur T^contribs 21:37, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Added Onur T^contribs 20:26, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Caitlin Hill

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Caitlin Hill, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. TwentiethApril1986 (want to talk?) 19:57, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Northpark Theatre

Nice picture for the Northpark Theatre. We should collab to get some of the more salient images for RHP for Erie County. Cheers :) Paranormal Skeptic (talk)

I saw you had placed a WikiProject Theatre tag on the talk page. Is this a theatre in the UK sense? Does it, or did it ever stage plays, drama, musicals or anything other than just movies? If not I don't think the Theatre tag is appropriate. KlickingKarl (talk) 23:26, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Amandapg.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Amandapg.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:17, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter (September 2009)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of YouTube celebrities (4th nomination)

As a major contributor to the article, I am letting you know about the 4th AFD. Ikip (talk) 21:40, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter

	The Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter
	Issue 2 (January 2010) Previous issue \| Next issue

Content

The community is currently

deciding whether

60,000

articles should be deleted.

background

File permission problem with File:Boh3m3big2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Boh3m3big2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kyle1278 22:04, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rescue

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armageddon theology WritersCramp (talk) 13:14, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Fearagent4.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Fearagent4.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:31, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Caitbig.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Caitbig.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:38, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Caitbig2.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Caitbig2.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 12:03, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Caitsmile.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Caitsmile.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 12:04, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dclogo2012.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dclogo2012.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:31, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter Volume I, Issue III February 2012 Front cover \| Feature \| News and announcements \| Humor \| Want ads
To contribute to the next newsletter, please visit the Newsletter draft page. ARS Members automatically receive this newsletter. To opt out, please remove your name from the recipients list.

File permission problem with File:Boh3m32.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Boh3m32.JPG, which you've sourced to http://www.flickr.com/photos/eecue/538449209/. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 08:50, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Rbboh3m32.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Rbboh3m32.JPG, which you've sourced to http://www.flickr.com/photos/eecue/538449209/. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 08:51, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dclogo2012.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dclogo2012.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:30, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Ichormosquito/crocker

User:Ichormosquito/crocker, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ichormosquito/crocker and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Ichormosquito/crocker during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 03:40, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Vegemite2.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Vegemite2.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:48, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mixed Nuts screencap.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mixed Nuts screencap.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:32, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ichormosquito. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of YouTubers

The List of YouTubers is being nominated for deletion again. I don't know why. It's been nominated so many damn times. Take a look here. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 00:56, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ichormosquito. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to WikiProject YouTube

Hello! I, (TheMasterGuru), would like to invite you to join WikiProject YouTube! We're working on:

Writing, cleaning up, and expanding articles about YouTube, in particular, these articles

Putting {{WikiProject YouTube}} on the talk pages of articles involving YouTube, and assessing articles with the template. This helps to categorize articles!

Sourcing BLP's affiliated with YouTube

Updating the project page, and spreading word about the project

and more!

It seems you might be interested, so please stop by! Thank you.

Proposed deletion of File:Thehill3j.JPG

The file File:Thehill3j.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Northpark4.JPG

The file File:Northpark4.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Thehill2.JPG

The file File:Thehill2.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]