User talk:Insane hussein

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

August 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Soylent Green has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Soylent Green was changed by Insane hussein (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.970131 on 2014-08-12T11:07:57+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:08, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Soylent Green, you may be blocked from editing. —SMALL JIM 11:09, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am just making the article true to the source. Of course wikipedia does not care about that. wikipedia only cares about bias. BIAS!!!!!!

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 09:29, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 00:50, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Insane hussein (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The article of Eric Garner is clearly biased against the NYPD and even goes so far as to be nothing more that a propaganda piece for National Action Network. I stated that the article is clearly bias in its language. This article needs a through review by a neutral third party.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 15:48, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.