User talk:JeremyStein

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Welcome!

Hello, JeremyStein, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! , Los Esqueakis 19:42, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Homonym

Nice job on this article. I felt uneasy about the first two paragraphs but didn't know how to fix them. hydnjo talk 17:41, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the compliment! That was my first major edit to an article. Before now, I've just fixed typos, wording, etc. I was worried someone would be mad that I changed his or her words. I'm still not completely happy with it, but I think it's better than it was. I just wanted to prevent anyone else from being confused the same way I was. I feel emboldened by your feedback. Thanks! By the way, should I have posted this as a response on my talk page? JeremyStein 17:57, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Some folks do it this (copy/paste) way to preserve continuity for an important thread and some will insist on keeping the comments entirely on their talk page. Most of us however don't mind a little back and forth for casual commentary such as this. You can, after all, go back and copy/paste the complete version if the need arises. The advantage of a back and forth over "all at one talk page" is that the other user will be notified of a response. Personally, I will on occasion copy/paste if I think that I may want to reference the conversation at a later time as the other party may delete or archive as he sees fit. BTW, if you do, be sure to copy from the edit window.

Welcome and happy editing, hydnjo talk 18:29, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Pseudoreligion

Thank you for your comments on Talk:Pseudoreligion regarding the Flying Spaghetti Monster inclusion; I've made some changes based on your suggestion. I think that there's definitely more to say on the topic... but I'm not necessarily the one to say it. :) —LeFlyman 22:22, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for sorting out my entry on WP:3O. Coincidentally, some anon just made a very similar edit at around the same time, so I'll probably end up straight back on there. Gotta love Wikipedia :-) File:Yemen flag large.png CTOAGN (talk) 22:08, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. It had been sitting on WP:3O for way too long! --JeremyStein 14:50, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Reunion AfD

Sorry about that, I didn't realise that I was overwriting another person's comments. I didn't delete anything from the AfD page and I didn't see any edit conflicts while making my own edit. Anyhow, I added back the deleted anon vote already. :) --Andylkl ^{[ talk! | c ]} 06:32, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About Reunion

Hello, Jeremy. I'm still new in Wikipedia and although I feel good here I have a few questions about this deletion purposal, for example what to do with ballot stuffing and vote tampering. Personally I find the main article so unprofessional and irrelevant for Wikipedia, and don't forget that the only main contributor was Mr. Claudre, the creator and current "emperor" of this so-called "micronation". Also the purposal is massively flooded of anonymous people, and using this free program I find that nearly all are Brazilian users, probably created by Mr. Claudre to change the voting result and then advertise his "game". And permanently changing original votes or calling other users "nazis" because they simply want to vote it's a thing that personally I find quite disgusting... I know that I can't vote already because I'm a new user, but I only suggest you to please do something. Goodbye. --ShiningEyes 09:54, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]