Jump to content

User talk:Joseph.nobles

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Welcome!

Hello, Joseph.nobles, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Rama's Arrow 20:09, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please fill out a proper report using the template given on that page. You can do so by following clicking the Click here to add a new report link in the gray box near the top of the page. Your report will not be acted on unless it is filled out properly. Thank you, rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 19:11, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk page guidelines

Joseph.nobles, please read Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#New topics and headings on talk pages. Section titles must be neutral. Please, do not restore your preferred version, as that would be in violation of the Wikipedia talk page guidelines.  Cs32en Talk to me  02:41, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I completely disagree. I haven't done anything in violation of talk page guidelines. I consider this more evidence of your WP:OWNERSHIP issues over this article, Cs32en. Joseph.nobles (talk) 02:51, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know whether you have actually read the talk page guidelines by now. They include the following guidance:

  • "Keep headings neutral: A heading should indicate what the topic is, but not communicate a specific view about it."
  • "Do not be critical in headings: This includes being critical about details of the article. Those details were written by individual editors, who may experience the heading as an attack on them."

  Cs32en Talk to me  03:11, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I have. I don't see any problem here other than your WP:OWNERSHIP issues being violated. Joseph.nobles (talk) 03:23, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

I hope that you will reconsider your recent edit at Talk:Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, in which you have reverted the talk page section titles to your preferred version, in violation of the [[talk page guidelines. If you will not undo your changes yourself, I'll report this at the appropiate noticeboard.  Cs32en Talk to me  03:21, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Be my guest. Joseph.nobles (talk) 03:27, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I would suggest waiting for one of the neutral editors already working on this page to weigh in before you escalate. Joseph.nobles (talk) 03:33, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For you

The Citation Barnstar The Citation Barnstar
For your initiative in creating the sources archive. unmi 16:25, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!