User talk:Kewp
300 / National Review
Hello, I notice you've added a review from The National Review to the 300 page. You will have noticed that the reviews are presently organized by type of media outlet, and at present there is none for political weeklies. If we're to open one, we would of course have to include, e.g., The New Republic and The Nation as well. Is that something you would be interested in working on? Best, --Javits2000 21:39, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- In the meantime I've trimmed the description of the "post 9-11" world to focus on the characterization of the film itself; and moved it under the "political aspects" header. Let me know what you think, Best, --Javits2000 22:02, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Cartesian Plain?
I think it is quite inapt to redirect Cartesian plain to Cartesian coordinate system without letting the user know they misspelled the word plane. There is no such thing as a cartesian plain and we should not lull users into believing that their spelling is correct.Zain Ebrahim 17:31, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
typos
Hello, I think there might be a few typos under your "stuff". Two links don't work Faustus Tacitus 22:31, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Mormon fundamentalism/merged article
A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Mormon fundamentalism/merged article, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 159.182.1.4 16:21, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Thomas Arthur Green
Thomas Arthur Green, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Thomas Arthur Green satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Arthur Green and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Thomas Arthur Green during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Eliz81 21:08, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Please don't add stuff to the article that's not written in a neutral point of view. Thanks, Somno (talk) 11:35, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Timothy Leary, you will be blocked from editing. mms (talk) 11:37, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, a friend visiting my house went on my computer and made the three March 8th edits using my account when I wasn't there. I am always logged in to Wikipedia so I didn't know he was doing this. I have spoken to him about it and I will be more careful about logging out of my account in the future. Kewp (t) 01:32, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
- It did seem out of character with your other edits. Just make sure you keep your login safe. :) Somno (talk) 01:56, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Bundang apartment buildings.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:33, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Kewp. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Kewp. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Kewp. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
I need a native translation of a sentence, into French
I need a native translation of a sentence, into Italian and French
- The sentence is: "Welcome to the first stage, of the fourth international program of MAL's method, the internatinal training course of MAL, 2021"
- By "program" I mean, like in: "governmental program", or "educational program", and the like.
- By "stage" I mean: phase/part/step (Actually the "program" consists of a few stages).
- I know to use GoogleTranslate, but I need a native translation.
- Additionally, I would like to know how to pronounce the whole translated sentence (including "2021"), so please add also the transcription in IPA (or in Latin letters, as close to the original pronunciation as possible - if you are not familiar with IPA). Please mark also the stress, e.g. by adding an apostrophe before the stressed syllable (or by typing the stressed vowel in a capital letter).