User talk:MontyKind

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

MontyKind, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi MontyKind! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks so much!!! Yes, must get some important info on those pages to make it more balanced!Hartman456 (talk) 00:20, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	Good job! Hartman456 (talk) 00:42, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, MontyKind. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Abu Usamah

Apologies if if it seemed as a vandalization. I am new to wikipedia, and I thought I would contribute in this area. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rahman.mukras (talk • contribs) 23:10, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Al Wahhab

Hey MonthyKind, Please help me to improve Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab. Here I explain Why I found this Problematic. Thanks a lot --Yortas (talk) 00:48, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Reversions

Hello,

I am just inquiring as to why you reverted the following changes of mine to Ta'wiz: https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Ta%27wiz&diff=prev&oldid=842523247. Your edit (reversion) summary stated "all sources are unreliable", though The Qur'an is reliable, hadith provided is graded as sahih, and IslamQA.info is a reputable site and is the most popular website that specializes in providing Islamic information. The scholars have agreed that ta'wiz and other amulets are forbidden.

Could you please inform me why you reverted my edit, though the sources are reliable? Perhaps my edit could benefit from more detail and/or additional sources?

Thank you! :)

– Batreeq ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 23:01, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Batreeq: - The website IslamQA.info is neither reliable or acceptable for a Wikipedia article as it is not scholarly and fails the criterion of WP:RS. The site is nothing more than a mouthpiece of the Salafi group and is known for intentionally posting factually and historically inaccurate material. Regarding Ta'wiz, there are a number of different positions in Islam which the article itself alludes to ("One group said that this is permissible. This was the view of ‘Abd-Allaah ibn ‘Amr ibn al-‘Aas and others.") so it would be wrong to say that, "Amulets and talismans are haram (forbidden) in Islam and are considered shirk" since in reality there are a whole spectrum of different views. MontyKind (talk) 11:47, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @MontyKind: I have revised my changes to be more detailed and utilized alternate sources in the intro, because you claim IslamQA.info is inaccurate. Thank you, – Batreeq ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 06:45, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

– Batreeq ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 00:41, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

:) Kind regards, – Batreeq ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 22:11, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! – Batreeq ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 04:45, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Assim al-Hakeem for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Assim al-Hakeem is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Assim al-Hakeem until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SWL36 (talk • contribs) 18:17, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Ibn Taymiyyah into Shrine. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:08, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, MontyKind. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]