User talk:NoHenry

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Welcome

RE: [1]

you should never have had that user blocked with the vandalism policy. Amazing that the admins did not realize it was an edit war. You were lucky. Travb (talk) 05:15, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What? He was blocked because George100 offered a comprimise edit which the other anonymous author accepted, but Colodny did not and continued to vandalize the page. Now we have another anonymous, maybe Colodny, further vandalizing, which I intend to warn as others have. NoHenry 19:00, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I support the outcome, I am just saying you were lucky. Edits wars are never vandalism. I tried a million times to get advesaries booted when I was edit warring, stating vandalism, and I was told "no way" every time. Travb (talk) 22:39, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Carter

Yes. See [2] Cheers. Vera, Chuck & Dave (talk) 20:24, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a Sock Puppet

It has become clear you are operating as a sock puppet account of PockyGirl-2002 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), and I have blocked you indefinitely. This has become clear at the Rosa Blasi article, where you both inserted deliberately incorrect information in an attempt to circumvent scrutiny. Please edit from a single account in future, unless you are willing to edit in a non-disruptive style from the additional accounts.

Anthøny 22:15, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are incorrect. We are both REVERSING vandalism. Review our edits again. For example, both our edits which you've link changed the subject's birth date and location from 1962 in Guatemala to 1972 in Chicago. Our information is correct, as you can verify on IMDB. It is the mostly anonymous editors that have repeatedly vandalized the page. The version of the page which you've reverted to and which I cannot now edit contains false information.NoHenry (talk) 22:21, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Goodness me, I've been silly. Please accept my apologies—I have lifted your block. You also have an email. Please accept my apologies. Anthøny 22:30, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem, sir. I realize it was a mistake. Thanks for lifting the block and responding so quickly to my concerns. Good day. NoHenry (talk) 22:36, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, my apologies, and thank you for being so understanding. Anthøny 22:38, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Substituting templates

Hello, NoHenry. I can see that you warned a user, Rosathebest. Do remember that you should put {{subst}} before the actual warning. It says so here. SchfiftyThree 00:06, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. NoHenry (talk) 00:08, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]